2017
DOI: 10.1590/1984-70332017v17n3n40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent selection of popcorn composites UEM-CO1 AND UEM-CO2 based on selection indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several studies that use the index methodology to predict genetic gains for maize selection (Amaral Júnior et al, 2010;Freitas et al, 2013;Vieira et al, 2017;Lima et al, 2018). However, studies on green-maize topcross hybrids -in which one of the parents is an open-pollinated variety, and the other is a single-cross hybrid, or an inbred line -using indexbased selection and REML/BLUP strategies are still scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies that use the index methodology to predict genetic gains for maize selection (Amaral Júnior et al, 2010;Freitas et al, 2013;Vieira et al, 2017;Lima et al, 2018). However, studies on green-maize topcross hybrids -in which one of the parents is an open-pollinated variety, and the other is a single-cross hybrid, or an inbred line -using indexbased selection and REML/BLUP strategies are still scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A selective pressure of 11.72% was adopted, for a total of 30 genotypes; the direct gains for the studied traits were calculated and, subsequently, the selection index was obtained from the sum of ranks (ranks) of Mulamba and Mock (1978), based on genotypic values. This index has proven efficiency in diverse crops, such as potato (Terres et al 2015), alfalfa (Vasconcelos et al 2010), popcorn (Vieira et al 2017), macaúba palm (Costa et al 2018), yellow passion fruit (Krause et al 2012), and coffee (Carias et al 2016). It has proven to be reliable and has provided balanced cultivars.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of genotypes that combine the greatest number of traits desired by breeders and farmers can be made through the use of indices that allow simultaneous selection for all traits, and thus the gains distributed among them (Vieira, Rocha, Scapim, & Amaral Junior, 2017). The Smith (1936) and Hazel (1943) index, which is also known as the classic index, is based on the linear combination of all traits that can be somehow weighted, and the genetic and phenotypic covariance between them (Berilli, Pereira, Trindade, Costa, & Cunha, 2013; Freitas Júnior, Amaral Júnior, Rangel, & Viana, 2009; Rodrigues, Von Pinho, Albuquerque, & Von Pinho, 2011; Teixeira, Oliveira, Gonçalves, & Nunes, 2012; Vieira et al., 2017). However, the difficulty of assigning economic weights to traits and the choice of those that are most relevant to selection are critical reasons for the application of the Smith and Hazel index (Hallauer et al., 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%