2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.05.27.493757
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent loss of an immunity gene that protects Drosophila against a major natural parasite

Abstract: Polymorphisms in immunity genes can have large effects on susceptibility to infection. To understand the origins of this variation, we investigated the genetic basis of resistance to the parasitoid wasp Leptopilina boulardi in Drosophila melanogaster. A cis-regulatory polymorphism in the gene Lectin-24A abolishes expression after infection, strongly reducing survival. Other null mutations have arisen repeatedly in this gene, with additional loss-of-expression and premature stop codons segregating in nature. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously found that the expression of lectin-24A increases resistance to parasitoids, and the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) line 437 carries a resistant allele of the gene whereas the DGRP-892 line carries a susceptible allele [12]. These two alleles differed in their expression levels, where the resistant allele is expressed at a higher level than the susceptible one in homeostasis and when the lectin-24A is upregulated after infection [12]. To investigate if the proximal upstream region of the lectin-24A gene responds specifically to parasitoid wasp infection, we infected D. melanogaster larvae expressing a lectin-24A reporter driven by 444 bp of sequence upstream from the transcription start site (TSS) of the resistant DGRP-437 allele ( Venus LP437 ) [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have previously found that the expression of lectin-24A increases resistance to parasitoids, and the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) line 437 carries a resistant allele of the gene whereas the DGRP-892 line carries a susceptible allele [12]. These two alleles differed in their expression levels, where the resistant allele is expressed at a higher level than the susceptible one in homeostasis and when the lectin-24A is upregulated after infection [12]. To investigate if the proximal upstream region of the lectin-24A gene responds specifically to parasitoid wasp infection, we infected D. melanogaster larvae expressing a lectin-24A reporter driven by 444 bp of sequence upstream from the transcription start site (TSS) of the resistant DGRP-437 allele ( Venus LP437 ) [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two alleles differed in their expression levels, where the resistant allele is expressed at a higher level than the susceptible one in homeostasis and when the lectin-24A is upregulated after infection [12]. To investigate if the proximal upstream region of the lectin-24A gene responds specifically to parasitoid wasp infection, we infected D. melanogaster larvae expressing a lectin-24A reporter driven by 444 bp of sequence upstream from the transcription start site (TSS) of the resistant DGRP-437 allele ( Venus LP437 ) [12]. This upstream region was chosen because it is the entire intergenic sequence between lectin-24A and its adjacent gene Shaw .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is extensive literature describing humoral responses to parasitoid attack, these generally refer to compounds that do not have clear anti-parasitoid roles, such as the production of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs) 16 that are instead likely to be activated in response to the introduction of microbes during oviposition by wasps or reactive oxygen species generated by prophenoloxidase enzymes produced by specialized hemocytes. Other fat body factors implicated in parasitoid defense in D. melanogaster influence hemocyte production (e.g., Edin) 54 , or encourage recruitment of hemocytes to the wasp egg (e.g., Lectin24A) 55,56 . Similar to aphids, some Drosophila species have adopted facultative symbioses with bacteria like Spiroplasma, which express RIPs to protect against parasitoid challenge 21,57 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it was concluded that selection for loss-of-function mutations had no prominent role in chicken domestication [8,9]. However, accumulating genomic evidence supports loss-offunction mutations as a major driving force for the evolution (for a review, see [10][11][12]) of animals [13][14][15][16][17] and plants [18] as well as for the domestication (for a review, see [19,20]) of many farm animals [21] and crops [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%