2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence Patterns and Survival for Patients With Intermediate- and High-Grade Myxofibrosarcoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
77
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
77
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…MFSs have a better survival rate than other types of sarcoma [30]. At a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the local recurrence was 31%, and metastasis occurred in 17% of the patients [16]. Lung, bone and lymph nodes are preferential sites of metastases [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFSs have a better survival rate than other types of sarcoma [30]. At a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the local recurrence was 31%, and metastasis occurred in 17% of the patients [16]. Lung, bone and lymph nodes are preferential sites of metastases [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,10 Recent retrospective cohorts of MFS reported a 5-year local recurrence rate of 18–31 % and an associated overall survival (OS) of approximately 70 %. 7,11,12 Tumor size at resection, tumor grade, positive surgical resection margin, percent necrosis, and mitotic rate have all been suggested as possible prognostic factors for disease-specific and metastasis-free survival, but these studies have been hampered by their small size and heterogeneous treatments. 11-13 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Margin status, however, has been the subject of conflicting reports on its ability to predict local recurrence of myxofibrosarcoma or UPS. 11,12,17,1819,20 In our dataset, local recurrence developed in 42% of patients who had an R1 resection, compared to 20% of patients with an R0 resection; however, this difference was not statistically significant ( p =0.064), perhaps because our study included only 38 R1 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%