2018
DOI: 10.30757/alea.v15-30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence of the frog model on the 3,2-alternating tree

Abstract: Abstract. Consider a growing system of random walks on the 3,2-alternating tree, where generations of nodes alternate between having two and three children. Any time a particle lands on a node which has not been visited previously, a new particle is activated at that node, and begins its own random walk. The model described belongs to a class of problems that are collectively referred to as the frog model. Building on a recent proof of recurrence (meaning infinitely many frogs hit the root with probability one… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the next step in the proof of the claim, we observe that because the harmonic measure of any single level 1 vertex is bounded above by 1 − β for some β > 0 (see explanation for this at the beginning of the proof of Lemma 4.4), this implies that it follows from Claim 1, along with Markov's inequality, that the expectation of the larger expression in (12) with respect to AGW n is bounded above by…”
Section: Proof Of Recurrencementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the next step in the proof of the claim, we observe that because the harmonic measure of any single level 1 vertex is bounded above by 1 − β for some β > 0 (see explanation for this at the beginning of the proof of Lemma 4.4), this implies that it follows from Claim 1, along with Markov's inequality, that the expectation of the larger expression in (12) with respect to AGW n is bounded above by…”
Section: Proof Of Recurrencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Since, by (12), this value must be greater than or equal to the expression to the left of the inequality in (10), it follows that (10) must hold for…”
Section: Proof Of Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hoffman et al [18] establish that the frog model is recurrent on the binary tree, but it is transient on d-ary trees, for d ≥ 5. We also refer to Hoffman et al [17], Johnson and Junge [23] and Rosenberg [40]. The subjects in (ii) are investigated mainly for processes on Z d (see, for instance, Alves et al [2], Ramírez and Sidoravicius [38], Höfelsauer and Weidner [16]), and lately analyzed on d-ary trees (Hoffman et al [20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the frog model, most of the work has involved studying the process on Z d , T d and recently on d-ary trees. As far as we know, only Rosenberg [15] considers another kind of tree, proving the recurrence of the process (without death) in a 3, 2-alternating tree (in which the generations of vertices alternate between having 2 and 3 children).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%