2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000128305.90650.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence and Outcomes Following Hepatic Resection, Radiofrequency Ablation, and Combined Resection/Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Abstract: Hepatic resection is the treatment of choice for colorectal liver metastases. RFA alone or in combination with resection for unresectable patients does not provide survival comparable to resection, and provides survival only slightly superior to nonsurgical treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

36
1,005
2
46

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,586 publications
(1,091 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
36
1,005
2
46
Order By: Relevance
“…In humans, RFA has been shown to be more effective than chemotherapy for the clinical treatment of metastatic cancer patients with minimal liver lesions (32). On the other hand, RFA treatment does not show any advantage in long-term survival compared to surgery in metastatic cancer patients (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, RFA has been shown to be more effective than chemotherapy for the clinical treatment of metastatic cancer patients with minimal liver lesions (32). On the other hand, RFA treatment does not show any advantage in long-term survival compared to surgery in metastatic cancer patients (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesions up to 3 cm can be treated by RF, both percutaneously or surgically (laparoscopy or laparotomy). Usually patients are treated with RF when damage does not spread outside the liver or when there it is possibility to control (or can control) the extrahepatic disease 2,17 . Most centers consider the patient treatable with up to four liver lesions.…”
Section: Methods Of Tumor Ablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the 5-year survival rate with hepatic resection (HR) is reported to range from 23 to 58 %. Therefore, HR has been recognized as the standard treatment for liver metastasis [5][6][7]. Nevertheless, some clinical conditions such as unfavorable tumor location, insufficient hepatic reserve, disease extent, and medical comorbidities make HR difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, many researchers report RFA to be less invasive as well as more safer than HR; the advantage of RFA lies in the fact that it can be performed repeatedly for recurrence or new metastases [11][12][13]. However, the therapeutic outcomes of RFA are reported to be inferior to those of HR [7,14], and studies published hitherto report the use of RFA primarily for surgically unresectable cases. Several recent studies reported the practice of performing RFA for resectable colorectal liver metastasis [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%