2015
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rectangle-capped and tilted micropillar array for enhanced anisotropic anti-shearing in biomimetic adhesion

Abstract: Dry adhesion observed in the feet of various small creatures has attracted considerable attention owing to the unique advantages such as self-cleaning, adaptability to rough surfaces along with repeatable and reversible adhesiveness. Among these advantages, for practical applications, proper detachability is critical for dry adhesives with artificial microstructures. In this study, we present a microstructured array consisting of both asymmetric rectangle-capped tip and tilted shafts, which produce an orthogon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(58 reference statements)
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uniform microstructure performs nearly symmetrically, while the uniform microstructure with added roughness shows a slightly higher ratio of 3.1 (95% CI: 2.0-6.0). This is in line with typical friction ratios reported in the literature for uniform microstructured adhesive materials [4][5][6][7][8]12,24,27], with asymmetric friction ratios below 10 : 1. By contrast, the spatially variant microstructure has a friction ratio of 100 (95% CI: 96 -110), an improvement of 100Â over the uniform microstructure and an order of magnitude better than previously published soft-polymer friction ratios.…”
Section: Characterization Of Adhesive Materialssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The uniform microstructure performs nearly symmetrically, while the uniform microstructure with added roughness shows a slightly higher ratio of 3.1 (95% CI: 2.0-6.0). This is in line with typical friction ratios reported in the literature for uniform microstructured adhesive materials [4][5][6][7][8]12,24,27], with asymmetric friction ratios below 10 : 1. By contrast, the spatially variant microstructure has a friction ratio of 100 (95% CI: 96 -110), an improvement of 100Â over the uniform microstructure and an order of magnitude better than previously published soft-polymer friction ratios.…”
Section: Characterization Of Adhesive Materialssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In general, the molds with micro/nano hole arrays are prepared by photolithography, where tilted exposures are required under a patterned shadow mask to create an angled structure. Here, the desired angle can be calculated by Snell’s law and by reactive ion etching (RIE), in which the holder should be tilted to the certain angle followed by subsequent etching [ 38 , 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Various Fabrication Methods For the Tilted Nanohairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many studies use a very stiff force sensor (e.g. [32], [33]), others use single or dual-axis cantilevers with comparatively low stiffness in comparison to a positioning stage [1], [27], [38], [41], [47], [48], [53]. While not all publications specify the cantilever stiffness, those that do often employ cantilevers that are stiffer than the adhesive itself, so that adhesive behavior remains dependent on the applied displacement trajectory.…”
Section: A Force-controlled Vs Displacement-controlled Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing against flat surfaces makes sample alignment more challenging but makes extraction of a limit curve in terms of pressure relatively easy. Previous approaches have included passive compliant approaches [35], [40], [45], [46], and precision rotation stages to perform sample alignment [8], [9], [41], [48], [51], [56]. The resulting limit curve represents an upper bound limit on adhesive performance, and is a starting point for analyzing more complex loading geometries [55], [57].…”
Section: B Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%