2020
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.202000059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Uranium(VI) from Sulfate Leach Liquor using Modified Duolite

Abstract: Silicate mercapto Duolite composite (SMDC) and activated Duolite A 101 D (AD) were prepared, characterized, and tested for uranium removal from sulfate solution using batch experiment technique. The capability of newly adsorbents for sorption of uranium was estimated and optimized under different controlling variables, including the impact of uranium initial concentration, pH of the medium, equilibrium time, temperatures, dose and interfering ions. Testing of different adsorbents for adsorption isotherms revea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the solid to acid ratio has been achieved using acid concentrations 40 % with a soaking time of 48 h and the abovementioned leaching conditions for the UM sample at room temperature. The uranium concentration in the solid sample is an important factor which is effective in the produced uranium adsorption through leaching process [27] . Figures 4a, b, and c show the leaching uranium isotopes values vs solid to acid ratio for different samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of the solid to acid ratio has been achieved using acid concentrations 40 % with a soaking time of 48 h and the abovementioned leaching conditions for the UM sample at room temperature. The uranium concentration in the solid sample is an important factor which is effective in the produced uranium adsorption through leaching process [27] . Figures 4a, b, and c show the leaching uranium isotopes values vs solid to acid ratio for different samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%