2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of gold(III) and iridium(IV) using magnetic layered double hydroxide (Fe3O4/Mg-Al-LDH) nanocomposite: Equilibrium studies and application to real samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in the Pareto charts, examined factors and their interaction were insignificant for the adsorption of Lev by the MnFe 2 O 3 /GO core–shell nanocomposite, as the bars did not cross the 95% confidence limit, except for the adsorbent dosage. 44 Moreover, the smaller the dosage of the adsorbent, the higher the adsorption capacity. It can be seen in Figure S1 that the increase in the experimental stirring rate increases the adsorption capacity of Lev.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in the Pareto charts, examined factors and their interaction were insignificant for the adsorption of Lev by the MnFe 2 O 3 /GO core–shell nanocomposite, as the bars did not cross the 95% confidence limit, except for the adsorbent dosage. 44 Moreover, the smaller the dosage of the adsorbent, the higher the adsorption capacity. It can be seen in Figure S1 that the increase in the experimental stirring rate increases the adsorption capacity of Lev.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PZC of material was found to be 6.9 ( Figure S1 ), this means that at pH lower than 6.9, the adsorbent’s surface is positively charged, while at higher pH (i.e., >6.9) the surface of the adsorbent anionic [ 56 ]. The optimum pH used for the adsorption was found to be 7, which is greater than the adsorbent’s PZC, thus suggesting that at optimum pH the adsorbent was anionic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many spent magnetic nanoadsorbent regeneration methods among which the chemical method appears to be popular (Meng et al 2018 ; Campos et al 2019 ; Gagliano et al 2020 ; Sahoo et al 2020 ; Bakhshi Nejad and Mohammadi 2020 ; Biata et al 2020 ; Jain et al 2021 ; Peralta et al 2021 ). Other adsorbent regeneration methods are thermal (Aguedal et al 2019 ), supercritical extraction (Momina et al 2018 ), microbial regeneration (Momina et al 2018 ), solvent extraction (Dutta et al 2019 ), and microwave and ultraviolet irradiation (Sun et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Developments With Magnetic Nanoadsorbents and Magnetic Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%