1988
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(88)90006-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery following fractures of the clavicle treated conservatively

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
50
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
50
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[9] The non union rate in mid-shaft clavicle fractures is less than 1%. [12,13] In contrast recent studies point at a non-union rate of 15% with patient outcomes turning out to be highly unsatisfactory (32%) as compared to studies like Altamimi et al [14] and Hill eta al. [15] Neer [16] and Rowe [17] reported non union in less than 0.5% in their huge series with 2235 and 566 patients respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9] The non union rate in mid-shaft clavicle fractures is less than 1%. [12,13] In contrast recent studies point at a non-union rate of 15% with patient outcomes turning out to be highly unsatisfactory (32%) as compared to studies like Altamimi et al [14] and Hill eta al. [15] Neer [16] and Rowe [17] reported non union in less than 0.5% in their huge series with 2235 and 566 patients respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…[5,9] The non union rate in mid-shaft clavicle fractures is less than 1%. [12,13] Traditionally these fractures have been treated non-operatively, even when displaced. [6,7] The fractures often go into malunion and shortening which can affect the shoulder function significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zlowodzkiet al, 17 in a meta-analysis of literature found that the nonunion rate of clavicles treated non-operatively was 15.1%, much higher than that was described earlier by Neer (0.1%). Stanley and Norris 18 stated that 33% of patients treated conservatively had symptoms 3 months after fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Conventionally, most acute-displaced mid shaft fractures were treated conservatively with the expectations of union, good function and patient satisfaction, as even with non-union not restrict function was acceptable to most of patients especially of old age group. [14][15][16][17] However conservative treatment once popular is not favourable as for young active patients with displaced fractures. Whereas operative treatment has shown better results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%