Recovery and self-efficacy of a newly trained certified peer specialist following supplemental weekly group supervision: A case-based time-series analysis

Weikel, Kim; Tomer, Adrian; Davis, Lynn; Sieke, Rachel

doi:10.1080/15487768.2016.1267051

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is probable that role-related factors influence peer supporters’ well-being and recovery in complex ways and that these change over time. A longitudinal case-series study has examined the impact of providing group supervisory support for peer specialists and found improvements over time with ongoing supervision on recovery and self-efficacy (Weikel, Tomer, Davis, & Sieke, 2017).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Providing mental health peer support 2: Relationships with empowerment, hope, recovery, quality of life and internalised stigma

Burke

Pyle

Machin

et al. 2018

Int J Soc Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Qualitative research has identified personal costs and benefits for peer supporters associated with their role; however, quantitative evidence is sparse. This study used quantitative methods to explore relationships in experiences of providing peer support with constructs of empowerment, hope, recovery, quality of life and internalised stigma. Differences were examined for those in statutory versus non-statutory services; who had themselves received peer support versus those who had not and who identified having had negative experiences in clinical teams versus those without such experiences. Methods: A cross-sectional online and postal survey was undertaken in tandem with a linked consensus study. In all, 147 peer supporters were recruited from a variety of organisations across the United Kingdom. Validated questionnaires were used to examine constructs. Instruments created for the study measured peer support experiences, and personal costs and benefits involved. Correlations were calculated and results informed further regression analysis. Chi-square tests and independent samples t-tests tested group differences. Results: Peer supporters indicated they experienced almost twice as many role-related personal benefits than personal costs. Benefits included improvements to mental health and well-being, reduced use of services, increased social functioning and development of skills. Total number of personal costs experienced was significantly negatively related to peer supporters’ empowerment and quality of life. There were no significant differences between the groups examined. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: An accumulation of personal costs may result in reduced quality of life; however, costs can be minimised by organisations. Limitations of the research are discussed and recommendations for future research are made including the need for longitudinal research.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Providing mental health peer support 2: Relationships with empowerment, hope, recovery, quality of life and internalised stigma

Burke

Pyle

Machin

et al. 2018

Int J Soc Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…CPS training could be strengthened by addressing workplace challenges that CPSs are known to encounter (i.e., coworkers who do not understand peer support) and guidance on how to handle them. CPSs should also be made aware that they are deserving of a supportive workplace that includes high-quality supervision because supervision is critical to their success (Weikel et al, 2017). CPSs should be coached on how to advocate for these resources during the job interviewing and throughout their employment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“Once a peer always a peer”: A qualitative study of peer specialist experiences with employment following state certification.

Siantz¹,

Pelot²,

Ostrow³

2023

Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Peer specialists are people with lived experience of a mental health or substance use disorder who are certified to deliver peer support services under state training programs. This qualitative study explored recently certified peer specialist (CPS) experiences navigating the job market to find postcertification employment, experiences with employment once in the workforce, and reflections on CPS training. Method: Qualitative data were collected as part of a multistate, 3-year observational prospective cohort study of CPS graduate employment trajectories. We conducted 25 in-depth, semistructured interviews with a subsample of recent CPS graduates who indicated a range of employment experiences in a survey as part of the parent study. Interviews focused on their current employment and satisfaction with the position and experiences looking for work. Data were analyzed using constant comparative methods informed by grounded theory. Results: Participants described factors that supported or undermined securing employment, which included a shortage of CPS positions, their professional networking skills, financial considerations, and a position’s alignment with CPS values. Once employed, participants described how relationships with supervisors and coworkers, which ranged from supportive to confused about the value of the peer specialist role, impacted their work. In general, participants held their CPS training and certification in high regard. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Our findings highlight policy, employment, and practice opportunities to strengthen CPS training to improve their work readiness of graduates and expand their role, while preparing organizations and their staff to hire and work inclusively with CPSs.

show abstract

“…It does not necessarily mean that these peer support specialists have reduced symptom severity. While only a few qualitative and survey-based studies have focused on the secondary gains of peer support services such as an increased sense of recovery among peers themselves (Burke et al, 2018;Hutchinson et al, 2006;Moran et al, 2012;Salzer et al, 2013;Weikel et al, 2017), our finding on the importance of recovery to occupational health is aligned with successful recovery being listed as a major qualification in job descriptions and other hiring guidelines of peer support specialists (Chappell Deckert & Statz-Hill, 2016;Clossey et al, 2018;Davidson et al, 2012;Gillard & Holley, 2014;Reif et al, 2014). However, because recovery is a long-term, nonlinear process and is intertwined with occupational health, it might need to be a permanent focus in both mental health services and peer supervision settings.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Research shows that most peer support specialists are engaged and satisfied with their jobs (Chang et al, 2016; Chappell Deckert & Statz-Hill, 2016; Cronise et al, 2016). Although these elements of work well-being have remained high, it is not well-established in qualitative studies or survey research whether the action of delivering peer support services is linked to the recovery process of peer support specialists (Burke et al, 2018; Hutchinson et al, 2006; Moran et al, 2012; Salzer et al, 2013; Weikel et al, 2017). There are also issues related to job dissatisfaction, work disengagement, and burnout from role obscurity, workplace stigma, high turnover rates, and insufficient supervision practices experienced by many peer support specialists (Chappell Deckert & Statz-Hill, 2016; Davidson et al, 2012; Gillard & Holley, 2014; Reif et al, 2014).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Key components of recovery predict occupational performance and health in peer support specialists.

Brooks

Umucu

et al. 2021

Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The primary purpose of the study was to explore and identify how components of recovery are associated with occupational performance and health among peer support specialists. Methods: One hundred and twenty-one peer support specialists were recruited from statewide peer certification training programs and the International Association of Peer Supporters. Study respondents completed a survey package including demographic questions and psychometrically sound self-report measures. Two hierarchical multivariable linear regression models were conducted to evaluate whether the recovery components of the process of recovery, social support for recovery, and work self-determination (i.e., work autonomy, work competence, and work relatedness) were associated with indicators of occupational performance (i.e., work engagement) and health (i.e., job satisfaction). Results: Work autonomy was associated with the occupational performance indicator, while the process of recovery and social support for recovery were the only recovery components associated with the indicator for occupational health. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Findings support the importance of work self-determination and social support and recovery for occupational performance and health among peer support specialists. Mental health and rehabilitation professionals should address these key components of recovery when working with and supporting the work well-being of peer support specialists. Impact and ImplicationsOur findings indicated key components of recovery are linked to work well-being among peer support specialists. Despite the promotion of recovery among service users, there has been limited focus on the recovery process experienced by peer support specialists employed in mental health systems. These findings underscore the need for service providers, employers, and supervisors of peer support specialists to address both recovery and work well-being among peer support specialists.

show abstract

Recovery and self-efficacy of a newly trained certified peer specialist following supplemental weekly group supervision: A case-based time-series analysis

Cited by 7 publications

References 33 publications

Providing mental health peer support 2: Relationships with empowerment, hope, recovery, quality of life and internalised stigma

Providing mental health peer support 2: Relationships with empowerment, hope, recovery, quality of life and internalised stigma

“Once a peer always a peer”: A qualitative study of peer specialist experiences with employment following state certification.

Key components of recovery predict occupational performance and health in peer support specialists.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About