Abstract:Background: It is suggested that the inverse relationship between allergic disease and family size reflects reduced exposure to early life infections, and that antibiotic treatment in childhood diminishes any protective effect of such infection. Methods: A birth cohort study was undertaken in 642 children recruited before birth and seen annually until the age of 8 years. Reported infections and prescribed antibiotics by the age of 5 years were counted from GP records and comparisons were made with a previous s… Show more
“…Taken together, this results in two studies with doubtful results [38,39], three studies in which the association disappeared after correcting for RC [3,40,42], and eight that found a positive association that could not be explained by RC [41,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Reverse Causationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Four other studies [3,[40][41][42] corrected for RC by means of excluding children who had already developed symptoms at the time of antibiotic use from the analyses. In three of these studies [3,40,42], initially positive associations between antibiotic use and wheeze or asthma disappeared after correction, whereas in the fourth study [41] the association between antibiotic use and wheeze remained after correcting for RC. RC as an explanation was unlikely in six studies that had ensured that exposure (antibiotic use) and follow-up periods took place subsequently and were not overlapping [43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Reverse Causationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies had a follow-up beyond pre-school age [36,42,44,45,47,48,50], several of them did not distinguish between age periods of diagnosis, thus still resulting in many cases already being diagnosed at pre-school ages [36,44,45,48]. The studies by MARTEL et al [45] and PONSONBY et al [36] did conduct subgroup analysis based on age of asthma onset, but with a cut-off of 3 and 4 yrs, respectively.…”
Our aim was to systematically review and meta-analyse longitudinal studies on antibiotic use and subsequent development of wheeze and/or asthma with regards to study quality, outcome measurement, reverse causation (RC; wheezing/asthma symptoms have caused prescription of antibiotics) and confounding by indication (CbI; respiratory tract infections leading to antibiotic use may be the underlying cause triggering asthma symptom development).English-language papers and studies published before November 1, 2010 with longitudinal observational design were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.We identified 21 longitudinal studies. The effect of antibiotic use on wheeze/asthma risk varied between studies. 18 studies were eligible for meta-analysis showing pooled OR 1.27 (95% CI 1.12-1.43) for wheeze/asthma. When we eliminated studies with possible RC and CbI, the pooled risk estimate in the nine remaining studies was attenuated to OR 1.12 (95% CI 0.98-1.26). Definition of wheeze/asthma and age at follow-up differed between studies. Three studies focused on wheeze/ asthma beyond 5-6 yrs of age with the presence of active symptoms and/or medication (pooled OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.93-1.23; dominated by one study).RC and CbI lead to overestimation of the association between antibiotic use and subsequent development of wheeze/asthma. Association was weak when fully adjusted for these types of bias. Heterogeneity of disease definition between studies could affect the results.
“…Taken together, this results in two studies with doubtful results [38,39], three studies in which the association disappeared after correcting for RC [3,40,42], and eight that found a positive association that could not be explained by RC [41,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Reverse Causationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Four other studies [3,[40][41][42] corrected for RC by means of excluding children who had already developed symptoms at the time of antibiotic use from the analyses. In three of these studies [3,40,42], initially positive associations between antibiotic use and wheeze or asthma disappeared after correction, whereas in the fourth study [41] the association between antibiotic use and wheeze remained after correcting for RC. RC as an explanation was unlikely in six studies that had ensured that exposure (antibiotic use) and follow-up periods took place subsequently and were not overlapping [43][44][45][46][47][48].…”
Section: Reverse Causationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies had a follow-up beyond pre-school age [36,42,44,45,47,48,50], several of them did not distinguish between age periods of diagnosis, thus still resulting in many cases already being diagnosed at pre-school ages [36,44,45,48]. The studies by MARTEL et al [45] and PONSONBY et al [36] did conduct subgroup analysis based on age of asthma onset, but with a cut-off of 3 and 4 yrs, respectively.…”
Our aim was to systematically review and meta-analyse longitudinal studies on antibiotic use and subsequent development of wheeze and/or asthma with regards to study quality, outcome measurement, reverse causation (RC; wheezing/asthma symptoms have caused prescription of antibiotics) and confounding by indication (CbI; respiratory tract infections leading to antibiotic use may be the underlying cause triggering asthma symptom development).English-language papers and studies published before November 1, 2010 with longitudinal observational design were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.We identified 21 longitudinal studies. The effect of antibiotic use on wheeze/asthma risk varied between studies. 18 studies were eligible for meta-analysis showing pooled OR 1.27 (95% CI 1.12-1.43) for wheeze/asthma. When we eliminated studies with possible RC and CbI, the pooled risk estimate in the nine remaining studies was attenuated to OR 1.12 (95% CI 0.98-1.26). Definition of wheeze/asthma and age at follow-up differed between studies. Three studies focused on wheeze/ asthma beyond 5-6 yrs of age with the presence of active symptoms and/or medication (pooled OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.93-1.23; dominated by one study).RC and CbI lead to overestimation of the association between antibiotic use and subsequent development of wheeze/asthma. Association was weak when fully adjusted for these types of bias. Heterogeneity of disease definition between studies could affect the results.
“…However, it should be noted that there is no clear relationship between allergic sensitization and allergic symptoms. 17,[51][52][53] Although allergic sensitization often overlaps with the occurrence of allergic symptoms, there are also many children without allergen-specific serum IgE/positive SPT that do develop allergic symptoms 17,19,21,22,26,31 and vice versa. 43 There might be a different …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 11 of 34 studies included explicitly reported that the use of antibiotics preceded the diagnosis of allergies. 10,12,16,18,21,[25][26][27]37,38,43 In our meta-analysis, we tested the association between antibiotics and risk of hay fever and eczema only in these 11 studies to infer causality and the results still showed a significant association.…”
This study systematically reviewed and quantified the relationship between exposure to antibiotics during the first 2 years of life and the risk of allergies/atopies including hay fever, eczema, food allergy, positive skin prick testing (SPT), or elevated allergen-specific serum/plasma immunoglobulin (Ig) E levels later in life.PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for observational studies published from January 1966 through November 11, 2015. Overall pooled estimates of the odds ratios (ORs) were obtained using fixed or random-effects models. Earlylife exposure to antibiotics appears to be related to an increased risk of allergic symptoms of hay fever, eczema, and food allergy later in life. The summary OR for the risk of hay fever (22 studies Early-life exposure to antibiotics has been related to some later life morbidities such as obesity, arthritis, asthma, and allergies. 6,7 A meta-analysis from 2006 showed a higher risk of asthma among those children exposed to antibiotics in early childhood. 8 However, a more recent meta-analysis from 2011 reported that the association between antibiotics exposure and subsequent development of wheeze/asthma was weak when the analysis was adjusted for reverse causation and confounding by indication.
9Several studies have suggested that early-life exposure to antibiotics is associated with an increased risk of developing allergies and atopies later in life, but results are inconsistent. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess and quantify the relationship between early-life exposure to antibiotics and the risk of developing symptoms of hay fever, eczema, food allergy, positive skin prick testing (SPT), or elevated allergen-specific serum/plasma immunoglobulin (Ig) E levels later in life.Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IgE, immunoglobulin E; OR, odds ratio; SPT, skin prick test.
In this paper, we report on a study to discover hidden patterns in survey results on adverse reactions and allergy (ARA) on antibiotics for children. Antibiotics are the most commonly prescribed drugs in children and most likely to be associated with adverse reactions. Record on adverse reactions and allergy from antibiotics considerably affect the prescription choices. We consider this a biomedical decision problem and explore hidden knowledge in survey results on data extracted from the health records of children, from the Health Center of Osijek, Eastern Croatia. We apply the K-means algorithm to the data in order to generate clusters and evaluate the results. As a result, some antibiotics form their own clusters. Consequently, medical professionals can investigate these clusters, thus gaining useful knowledge and insight into this data for their clinical studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.