1991
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.8.001892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of rough-surface profiles with the Kirchhoff approximation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such reconstruction will not be exact, because the correlation coefficient between the surface profile and the reflected field phase is less than 1 in absolute magnitude. However, this "qualitative" reconstruction is possible and it is much simpler than previously suggested algorithms, which require measurements of both magnitude and phase of the electric field scattered in all directions from the surface [22]. The measurement techniques for such kind of measurements are already developed for the antenna near-field measurements.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such reconstruction will not be exact, because the correlation coefficient between the surface profile and the reflected field phase is less than 1 in absolute magnitude. However, this "qualitative" reconstruction is possible and it is much simpler than previously suggested algorithms, which require measurements of both magnitude and phase of the electric field scattered in all directions from the surface [22]. The measurement techniques for such kind of measurements are already developed for the antenna near-field measurements.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21). Since the phase of the complex exponential changes in the direction defined by k 0 − k r , only regions of the surface where the surface normal is in this direction will contribute to the integral.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When light is scattered from the interface between homogenous media, however, it is not necessary to assume the Born approximation and, providing that there is no multiple scattering and the surface is smooth at the optical scale, the process is also linear. A detailed analysis of surface scattering has been presented by Beckmann and Spizzichino [20] and this forms the basis of inverse scattering methods that attempt to deduce surface topography from measurements of the scattered field [21][22][23]. In this case, the surface boundary conditions are assumed and the object can be replaced by an infinitely thin foil-like object, which follows the surface topography and henceforth will be called the "foil model" of the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transverse resolution is then easily estimated from the spatial frequency span off that is accessible with the given illumination and detection angles. Note that, in [14], single scattering inversions of 2D surfaces are performed without the paraxial approximation, but with somehow equivalent results: the main and limiting assumption is single scattering.…”
Section: Boundary Integral Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%