1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(96)00153-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconsolidation of memory after its reactivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
282
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 426 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
282
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it has been demonstrated that Pavlovian associations require a protein synthesis-dependent "reconsolidation" (Nader et al, 2000). This reconsolidation may involve plasticity-related processes (Przybyslawski and Sara, 1997), and the selective changes in the regional expression of the plasticity-related gene ␥ PKC in those groups in which the light stimulus was associated with cocaine seen in the present study may form part of the molecular mechanism underlying the lasting storage of this Pavlovian association. Furthermore, the associative storage of input patterns to the NAcc may be mediated by the strengthening sets of prefrontal and amygdala inputs.…”
Section: Synthesissupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Thus, it has been demonstrated that Pavlovian associations require a protein synthesis-dependent "reconsolidation" (Nader et al, 2000). This reconsolidation may involve plasticity-related processes (Przybyslawski and Sara, 1997), and the selective changes in the regional expression of the plasticity-related gene ␥ PKC in those groups in which the light stimulus was associated with cocaine seen in the present study may form part of the molecular mechanism underlying the lasting storage of this Pavlovian association. Furthermore, the associative storage of input patterns to the NAcc may be mediated by the strengthening sets of prefrontal and amygdala inputs.…”
Section: Synthesissupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Since the reminder that induce reconsolidation is also a part of the cues presented during training, but the unconditioned stimulus (US) is not presented after the conditioned stimulus (CS), new information is available for being learned and other processes emerge as candidates for explaining any post-retrieval effect, like extinction (Myers and Davis, 2002). Standard controls determine that retention performance should not be affected if the treatment is administered in absence of memory reactivation or showing that the post-retrieval treatment needs to be given before the end of a temporal window to be effective (Alberini, 2011;Alberini, Milekic, & Tronel, 2006;Dudai, 2006;Misanin, Miller, & Lewis, 1968;Przybyslawski & Sara, 1997;Tronson & Taylor, 2007). However, none of these controls can completely discard that a new learning process is occurring, and that it is the actual responsible for performance in subsequent tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result lends significant support to the current widely held view that reactivated old memories undergo a "reconsolidation" process to update the information. For the most part, the existence of reconsolidation processes have only been inferred from the fact that amnesia can be induced after reactivation of well established memories (Przybyslawski and Sara, 1997;Nader et al, 2000) (for review, see Sara, 2000;Nader, 2003;Dudai, 2006). If the learning-dependent increase in spindle density is, as it is purported to be, a physiological marker of off-line memory consolidation, then the increase seen after retrieval from remote memory may indeed indicate that a reconsolidation process is taking place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%