2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c05340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfiguring DNA Nanotube Architectures via Selective Regulation of Terminating Structures

Abstract: Molecular assemblies inside cells often undergo structural reconfiguration in response to stimuli to alter their function. Adaptive reconfiguration of cytoskeletal networks, for example, enables cellular shape change, movement, and cargo transport and plays a key role in driving complex processes such as division and differentiation. The cellular cytoskeleton is a self-assembling polymer network composed of simple filaments, so reconfiguration often occurs through the rearrangement of its component filaments' … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 43 Recent developments in dynamic nanoassembly also highlight the need to understand the impact of local environment and organization on enzyme activity. 36 , 44 , 45 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 43 Recent developments in dynamic nanoassembly also highlight the need to understand the impact of local environment and organization on enzyme activity. 36 , 44 , 45 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high programmability and the possibility to predict in a straightforward way the thermodynamics of the involved non‐covalent hydrogen bond base pairings, together with the low cost of synthesis, has allowed the self‐assembly of unprecedented precise 2D and 3D structures, hydrogels, nanodevices and polymers from rationally designed synthetic DNA oligonucleotides [39–45] . Recently, the possibility to reconfigure these structures has also been demonstrated enabling dynamic DNA structures with potential adaptive behavior [46–51] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Recently,t he possibility to reconfigure these structures has also been demonstrated enabling dynamic DNAs tructures with potential adaptive behavior. [46][47][48][49][50][51] Motivated by the above arguments and taking advantage of the addressability of DNAw es how here that synthetic nucleic acids are particularly suited for designing self-assembling dynamic polymer-like structures that can be easily reconfigured and reorganized by external inputs.T od ot his we have rationally designed monomer units that can be orthogonally addressed by different DNAr egulator strands and can be used to structurally reorganize the polymers between homopolymers,r andom co-polymers and two-tile and three-tile block co-polymers (Figure 1d). Thev ersatility of the systems presented in this study shows the ease at with DNA-based supramolecular polymers can be controlled using external triggers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39][40][41][42][43][44][45] Recently, the possibility to reconfigure these structures has also been demonstrated enabling dynamic DNA structures with potential adaptive behaviour. [46][47][48][49][50][51] Motivated by the above arguments and taking advantage of the addressability of DNA we show here that synthetic nucleic acids are particularly suited for designing selfassembling dynamic polymer-like structures that can be easily reconfigured and reorganized by external inputs. To do this we have rationally designed monomer units that can be orthogonally addressed by different DNA regulator strands and can be used to structurally reorganize the polymers between homopolymers, random co-polymers and diand tri-block co-polymers (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%