2009
DOI: 10.1201/9781420062670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfigurable System Design and Verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, reconfigurable FPGAs introduce an additional level of complexity. As a matter of fact, FPGAs can dynamically change the DSP functionality by keeping constant the structural features [18]. Accordingly, the gap between P s and P f is narrowed, because the same hardware resources can be exploited for different applications (modifying configuration and routing).…”
Section: The Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, reconfigurable FPGAs introduce an additional level of complexity. As a matter of fact, FPGAs can dynamically change the DSP functionality by keeping constant the structural features [18]. Accordingly, the gap between P s and P f is narrowed, because the same hardware resources can be exploited for different applications (modifying configuration and routing).…”
Section: The Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the ability to design the entire static design of an FPGA in a simpler and faster way, by means of abstract structures, it is possible to achieve peculiar capabilities, such as partial dynamic reconfiguration. Partial reconfiguration is an advanced technique that allows one to change the configuration of a FPGA at runtime [18,19]. The dynamic reconfiguration of systems, which uses functionality to replace configuration data without interrupting its operation, has been provided for many years [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the channels are referenced by their Identifiers (IDs) and provide the tasks with an easy interface to access communication and synchronization resources of the OS. Depending on placement restrictions imposed on HW tasks, we can distinguish different models of reconfigurable area [6]. 2D model is the most flexible and does not impose any restrictions on the placement of the tasks, provided that they do not overlap.…”
Section: Architecture Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the idea of virtual hardware managed by an OS was first proposed by Brebner in [3,4], Wigley and Karney [5] defined a set of properties an Operating System for Reconfigurable Systems (OS4RS) should have. These properties have been refined later on as the research in this field progressed [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an embedded operating system that supports the DPRS architecture is called an Operating System for Reconfigurable Systems (OS4RS), using which user applications can be executed as software tasks, hardware tasks, or both according to system performance requirements. As a result, such an OS4RS design with the DPRS platform is a self-adaptable system design, in which its functionalities can dynamically change without human intervention [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%