2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.03176
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Wireless Communications: Overview of Hardware Designs, Channel Models, and Estimation Techniques

Abstract: The demanding objectives for the future sixth generation (6G) of wireless communication networks have spurred recent research efforts on novel materials and radio-frequency front-end architectures for wireless connectivity, as well as revolutionary communication and computing paradigms. Among the pioneering candidate technologies for 6G belong the reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs), which are artificial planar structures with integrated electronic circuits that can be programmed to manipulate the incom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
(196 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R P , ] ∈ R P ×1 that contains the number of components for each factor for a certain P (with P = 3 in this case). As expected, when the number of components R or R (3) increases, the achievable data rate also increases, and we can observe that for the PARAFAC-IRS model with R = 16 and for the Tucker-IRS model with R 3 = [16,4,4], the proposed models achieves the optimum performance of the benchmark method [34].…”
Section: A Parafac-irs Vs Tucker-irssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…R P , ] ∈ R P ×1 that contains the number of components for each factor for a certain P (with P = 3 in this case). As expected, when the number of components R or R (3) increases, the achievable data rate also increases, and we can observe that for the PARAFAC-IRS model with R = 16 and for the Tucker-IRS model with R 3 = [16,4,4], the proposed models achieves the optimum performance of the benchmark method [34].…”
Section: A Parafac-irs Vs Tucker-irssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…With the factorization, an additional complexity is introduced on the IRS controller, which will have to build the phase-shift vector, which in this case is given as s = s (3) ⊗s (2) ⊗s (1) ∈ C 1024×1 . Physically, the Kronecker product in (11) represents a summation of the factors phase-shifts, as shown in Figure 1 (b).…”
Section: Proposed Feedback-aware Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the previous sections, the introduced system does not provide the desired data acquisition rate due to numerous scanning points in the vertical direction and the need for many frequency samples. We address this issue by defining a minimization problem using CS theory and based on the relation extracted in (10) so that there is no need to collect numerous data at the Nyquist rate. Assume that s exhibits sparsity on a certain orthonormal basis .…”
Section: B Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of implementation are provided in Section III. By solving the above problem, s can be retrieved with much less data (according to CS theory), and then the scene image can be reconstructed by using (10). A summary of the main steps of implementing the proposed approach with the variables introduced above is given in the form of a block diagram in Fig.…”
Section: B Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation