2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling professional identity: A grounded theory of nurse academics' role modelling for undergraduate students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrasts with a study examining the value of being taught by registrants to students (Attenborough & Abbott, ), where students reported it not being important if lecturers were not absolutely up‐to‐date with every detail of practice. Andrew (2011) suggests a “close to practice culture” (p430) where actual practice is not possible, whereas Baldwin, Mills, Birks, and Budden () differentiate between clinical currency and clinical legitimacy, clinical credibility and the currency of nursing knowledge, acknowledging the importance of role‐modelling and “storytelling” (p2) of lecturers’ professional and clinical lives. Significantly, in Midwifery 2020: Delivering Expectations, the Department of Health called for innovative solutions to enable midwifery academics employed in universities to maintain their clinical credibility: “Midwifery lecturing staff who are credible in the practice environment are well positioned to support students....” (Department of Health, , p. 41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contrasts with a study examining the value of being taught by registrants to students (Attenborough & Abbott, ), where students reported it not being important if lecturers were not absolutely up‐to‐date with every detail of practice. Andrew (2011) suggests a “close to practice culture” (p430) where actual practice is not possible, whereas Baldwin, Mills, Birks, and Budden () differentiate between clinical currency and clinical legitimacy, clinical credibility and the currency of nursing knowledge, acknowledging the importance of role‐modelling and “storytelling” (p2) of lecturers’ professional and clinical lives. Significantly, in Midwifery 2020: Delivering Expectations, the Department of Health called for innovative solutions to enable midwifery academics employed in universities to maintain their clinical credibility: “Midwifery lecturing staff who are credible in the practice environment are well positioned to support students....” (Department of Health, , p. 41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contrasts with a study examining the value of being taught by registrants to students (Attenborough & Abbott, 2018), where students reported it not being important if lecturers were not absolutely up-to-date with every detail of practice. suggests a "close to practice culture" (p430) where actual practice is not possible, whereas Baldwin, Mills, Birks, and Budden (2017) However, clinical credibility and identity were quite distinct;…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this process, the role of teachers, as nurses, seems important for students to materialize what it means to be and work as a nurse. The professors' role in this construction is not limited to the classroom (23) and their contextualized performance in the fields of practice occupied a prominent place in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with this finding, studies have observed that the manifestation of values by professional models, in the practical field, is a great incentive for students to develop these characteristics (29) . Students can take teachers as examples and seek to appropriate professional attributes at the beginning of training, during the internship, and in the future career (23) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the examined studies were collected in a manner analogous to purposeful sampling. 46 The inclusion criteria resulted in a sample of 40 studies to analyze for this project: two in dentistry/dental hygiene, 47,48 10 in medicine, [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] 10 in nursing, [59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] four in occupational therapy, [69][70][71][72] eight in pharmacy, [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80] two in physical therapy, 81,82 and four in social work. [83][84][85][86] The authors were typically a mix of clinicians (eg, MD), clinician-scientists (eg, RN-PhD), and/or social scientists (eg, PhD in education).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%