Reconciling Environment and Production in Managed Ecosystems: Is Ecological Intensification a Solution?

Cordonnier, Thomas; Peyron, Jean-Luc

doi:10.1007/s00267-015-0608-8

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Second, we proved that, by increasing biodiversity productivity, the level of biodiversity at equilibrium decreases, since when biodiversity is more productive, farmers can maintain lower biodiversity to get the same yield. Our result brings attention to the fact that ecological engineering, associated with ecological intensification, might have a detrimental impact on biodiversity, and might not be favorable to the maintenance of biodiversity, in contrast to what is often assumed (e.g., Cordonnier & Peyron, ; Geertsema et al, ). Another consequence is that it brings attention to the differences between the ends of preservation of biodiversity and ecosystems services.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%

Relationship between biodiversity and agricultural production

Brunetti

Tidball

Couvet

2019

Natural Resource Modeling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The intensification of agriculture is one of the main causes of biodiversity loss. We model the interdependent relationship between agriculture and wild biodiversity providing regulating services to agriculture on farmed land. We suppose that while agriculture has a negative impact on wild biodiversity, the latter can increase agricultural production. Farmers act as myopic agents, who maximize their instantaneous profit without considering the negative effects of their practice on the evolution of biodiversity. Two unexpected results arise (a) a tax on inputs can have a positive effect on yield since it can be considered as a social signal helping farmers to avoid myopic behavior concerning the positive effect of biodiversity on yield; (b) increasing biodiversity productivity, a proposal of ecological intensification, affects negatively the level of biodiversity, a counter‐intuitive result; due to the fact that when biodiversity is more productive, farmers can maintain lower biodiversity to get the same yield. Recommendations for Resource Managers In this study, we present a model to describe the interdependent relationship between farming activity and biodiversity on farmed land. Besides considering the negative impact of agriculture on biodiversity, models should take into account the fact that biodiversity can increase production. In contrast to what is generally expected, the tax can have a positive effect on yield because the tax can be considered as a social signal helping farmers to avoid myopic behavior in regard to the positive effect of biodiversity on yield, discounting its future positive effect. Moreover, increasing the productivity of wild biodiversity, which provides ecosystem services favorable to agriculture, a proposal of ecological intensification, can be detrimental to such biodiversity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 56%