Recommendations on vaccination for Latin American small animal practitioners: a report of the WSAVA Vaccination Guidelines Group

Abstract

Executive Summary The World Small Animal Veterinary Association Vaccination Guidelines Group has produced global guidelines for small companion animal practitioners on best practice in canine and feline vaccination. Recognising that there are unique aspects of veterinary practice in certain geographical regions of the world, the Vaccination Guidelines Group undertook a regional project in Latin America between 2016 and 2019, culminating in the present document. The Vaccination Guidelines Group gathered scientific and demographic data during visits to Argentina, Brazil and Mexico, by discussion with national key opinion leaders, visiting veterinary practices and review of the scientific literature. A questionnaire survey was completed by 1390 veterinarians in five Latin American countries and the Vaccination Guidelines Group delivered continuing education at seven events attended by over 3500 veterinarians. The Vaccination Guidelines Group recognised numerous challenges in Latin America, for example: (1) lack of national oversight of the veterinary profession, (2) extraordinary growth in private veterinary schools of undetermined quality, (3) socioeconomic constraints on client engagement with preventive health care, (4) high regional prevalence of some key infectious diseases (e.g. feline leukaemia virus infection, canine visceral leishmaniosis), (5) almost complete lack of minimal antigen vaccine products as available in other markets, (6) relative lack of vaccine products with extended duration of immunity as available in other markets, (7) availability of vaccine products withdrawn from other markets (e.g. Giardia vaccine) or unique to Latin America (e.g. some Leishmania vaccines), (8) accessibility of vaccines directly by pet owners or breeders such that vaccination is not delivered under veterinary supervision, (9) limited availability of continuing education in veterinary vaccinology and lack of compulsion for continuing professional development and (10) limited peer‐reviewed published scientific data on small companion animal infectious diseases (with the exception of leishmaniosis) and lack of support for such academic research. In this document, the Vaccination Guidelines Group summarises the findings of this project and assesses in evidence‐based fashion the scientific literature pertaining to companion animal vaccine‐preventable diseases in Latin America. The Vaccination Guidelines Group makes some recommendations on undergraduate and postgraduate education and academic research. Recognising that current product availability in Latin America does not permit veterinarians in these countries to vaccinate according to the global World Small Animal Veterinary Association guidelines, the Vaccination Guidelines Group makes a series of “pragmatic” recommendations as to what might be currently achievable, and a series of “aspirational” recommendations as to what might be desirable for the future. The concept of “vaccine husbandry” is addressed via some simple guidelines for the management of vaccine products i...

The first evaluation of the effectiveness of canine vaccination schedule by two commercial vaccines in Iran

“…Based on WSAVA guidelines, the dogs that have 8 week-age should be vaccinated every 3–4 weeks until they reached to the 16 weeks of life or more [ 30 ]. In Iran, the vaccination program is started at 8 weeks for puppies, during which they receive 3 vaccination periods every 4 weeks.…”

Capacitação e percepção de médicos-veterinários, gestores, funcionários e voluntários atuantes nos abrigos em Medicina de Abrigos no Brasil

“…Em relação à prática de vacinar os animais no momento da admissão, após o curso houve maior quantia de participantes que concordou totalmente, entretanto, uma parcela menor concordou parcialmente e uma ínfima parcela dos participantes discordou. No geral, os abrigos de animais são caracterizados por diversos riscos inerentes que facilitam a transmissão de doenças infecciosas (Larson et al, 2009;Hurley & Miller, 2009;Newbury et al, 2010;Gingrich & Lappin, 2012;Duddley et al,2015;Cossio et al, 2017;Day et al, 2020), principalmente no Brasil, em que o tempo de permanência dos animais é muito variável, sendo, geralmente, de alguns meses até anos, com introdução constante de novos animais e, em grande parte, dividindo um espaço físico insuficiente e com condições sanitárias inadequadas (Arruda et al, 2020;Cuglovici & Amaral, 2021;. Dessa maneira, as consequências da infecção nesses ambientes podem ser potencialmente devastadoras; sendo recomendado pelas diretrizes atuais programas de vacinação mais intensivos, ou seja, a vacinação de todos os animais no momento da admissão no abrigo ou uma semana antes (Larson & Schultz, 2006;Larson et al, 2009;Lechner et al, 2010;Newbury et al, 2010;Spindel, 2012;Scherk et al, 2013;Day, Horzinek et al, 2016;Stone et al, 2020;.…”

El tercer gran salto: los coronavirus animales en América Latina

“…Solo existen vacunas a virus atenuado o inactivado (Tizard, 2020) para el biotipo CECoV. Sin embargo, no suelen estar recomendadas ya que no se ha establecido un claro beneficio para los cachorros, principales destinatarios de estas (Day et al, 2020). Esto se debe a que la inmunidad pasiva brindada por el calostro materno interfiere en la producción de inmunidad por la vacunación (Franco & Puentes, 2020).…”