1994
DOI: 10.1351/pac199466081739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids (Technical Report)

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

45
1,222
0
28

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,384 publications
(1,393 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
45
1,222
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, N 2 sorption data give clear evidence of the mesoporosity of the meso-HSiO 1.5 ( Figure 2D). The adsorptionÀdesorption branches display type IV isotherms, typical for mesoporous materials, 26 with a BET surface area of 434 m 2 /g and a narrow pore size distribution centered at 10.5 nm Journal of the American Chemical Society ARTICLE ( Figure 2D, inset). The observed hysteresis occurs as a result of capillary condensation in mesopores with diameters larger than ca.…”
Section: ' Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, N 2 sorption data give clear evidence of the mesoporosity of the meso-HSiO 1.5 ( Figure 2D). The adsorptionÀdesorption branches display type IV isotherms, typical for mesoporous materials, 26 with a BET surface area of 434 m 2 /g and a narrow pore size distribution centered at 10.5 nm Journal of the American Chemical Society ARTICLE ( Figure 2D, inset). The observed hysteresis occurs as a result of capillary condensation in mesopores with diameters larger than ca.…”
Section: ' Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeolite and ceramic showed porous morphology, indicating that the zeolite and ceramic had bigger specific surface areas than the oyster shell and medical stone. In addition, the zeolite displayed micropore structure, while the ceramic showed macropore structure according to IUPAC classification for mineral pores with b 2 nm as micropores, 2-50 nm as mesopores and N50 nm as macropores (Rouquerol et al, 1994).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Wetland Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, determining the internal geometrical features, such as porosity and pore sizes, remains nontrivial. One of the standard methods to assess the porosity and the pore-size distribution is mercury intrusion porosimetry [7]. The method presupposes a structure of perfect cylindrical pores that are filled with mercury under pressure and has been proven to provide incorrect results for certain porous materials [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method presupposes a structure of perfect cylindrical pores that are filled with mercury under pressure and has been proven to provide incorrect results for certain porous materials [8,9]. Other methods used to assess the fine geometrical features of nanoporous materials include scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [9], x-ray computed tomography [10], radiation scattering [7], and gas adsorption techniques [7]. However, these methods are of high complexity, require long data collection times, and can be destructive or hazardous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%