2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-019-02975-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for gap-filling eddy covariance latent heat flux measurements using marginal distribution sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the strong seasonal and diurnal variation of ET, linear interpolation is not recommended. A standard procedure is to use the marginal distribution sampling (MDS) gap-filling algorithm, which considers meteorological variables to account for the daily and annual seasonality (Falge et al, 2001;Foltýnová et al, 2020;Reichstein et al, 2005;Wutzler et al, 2018). The monthly and yearly values of ET from MDS gapfilling will later be compared with the modelled ET predictions.…”
Section: Eddy Covariance Flux Towersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Given the strong seasonal and diurnal variation of ET, linear interpolation is not recommended. A standard procedure is to use the marginal distribution sampling (MDS) gap-filling algorithm, which considers meteorological variables to account for the daily and annual seasonality (Falge et al, 2001;Foltýnová et al, 2020;Reichstein et al, 2005;Wutzler et al, 2018). The monthly and yearly values of ET from MDS gapfilling will later be compared with the modelled ET predictions.…”
Section: Eddy Covariance Flux Towersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These instruments can provide quite different estimates as soil evaporation, transpiration and interception loss are very distinctive processes which are challenging to separate, particularly when measured by micrometeorological approaches (Miralles et al, 2020).ET is mainly driven by atmospheric conditions such as sunlight intensity (i.e. incoming radiation), air temperature and relative humidity (Foltýnová et al, 2020). In contrast, the volume of ET over the year depends greatly on the land surface and the water availability in the soil (Dwarakish et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2020;Zheng et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The advantage of inferential modeling is that long gaps in flux time series can be filled. This is not possible with MDV or other recently published gap-filling methods (e.g., Falge et al, 2001;Reichstein et al, 2005;Moffat et al, 2007;Wutzler et al, 2018;Foltýnová et al, 2020;Kim et al, 2020) because the latter are optimized for inert gases. Statistical methods like MDV assume a periodic variability of fluxes.…”
Section: Uncertainties Of Flux Measurements and Gap-filling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%