RANLP 2017 - Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing Meet Deep Learning 2017
DOI: 10.26615/978-954-452-049-6_069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing Reputation Defence Strategies in Critical Political Exchanges

Abstract: We propose a new task of automatically detecting reputation defence strategies in the field of computational argumentation. We cast the problem as relation classification, where given a pair of reputation threat and reputation defence, we determine the reputation defence strategy. We annotate a dataset of parliamentary questions and answers with reputation defence strategies. We then propose a model based on supervised learning to address the detection of these strategies, and report promising experimental res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on face-saving and reputation management focused on identifying various persuasive strategies and their effectiveness (Benoit, 1995;Coombs and Holladay, 2008;Burns and Bruner, 2000;Sheldon and Sallot, 2008). In the NLP field, Naderi and Hirst (2017) performed a manual annotation analysis on reputation defence strategies in Parliament and proposed a computational model to identify strategies of denial, excuse, justification, and concession. Naderi and Hirst (2018) further proposed two approaches to automatically annotate unlabeled speeches with defence strategies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on face-saving and reputation management focused on identifying various persuasive strategies and their effectiveness (Benoit, 1995;Coombs and Holladay, 2008;Burns and Bruner, 2000;Sheldon and Sallot, 2008). In the NLP field, Naderi and Hirst (2017) performed a manual annotation analysis on reputation defence strategies in Parliament and proposed a computational model to identify strategies of denial, excuse, justification, and concession. Naderi and Hirst (2018) further proposed two approaches to automatically annotate unlabeled speeches with defence strategies.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%