2010
DOI: 10.1080/08824090903526588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing Contributions: Face–Support and Face-Threat Influences Students’ Emotional and Communicative Responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results show that rejection and criticism lead directly to negative affect, but the effect on retaliation is indirect, operating through negative affect in a form of mediation. Prior research has examined a variety of face threats (e.g., Kennedy-Lightsey, 2010; Oetzel & Ting-Toomey, 2003) and proposed multiple models for how these threats lead to emotional responses and behavior (e.g., Brett et al, 2007; Dillard & Shen, 2005; Rains, 2013). However, prior research has not directly explored rejection and criticism as positive face threats and examined how these threats indirectly lead to retaliatory aggression operating through negative affect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Results show that rejection and criticism lead directly to negative affect, but the effect on retaliation is indirect, operating through negative affect in a form of mediation. Prior research has examined a variety of face threats (e.g., Kennedy-Lightsey, 2010; Oetzel & Ting-Toomey, 2003) and proposed multiple models for how these threats lead to emotional responses and behavior (e.g., Brett et al, 2007; Dillard & Shen, 2005; Rains, 2013). However, prior research has not directly explored rejection and criticism as positive face threats and examined how these threats indirectly lead to retaliatory aggression operating through negative affect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study built on earlier research by proposing and testing a model of how positive face threats lead to negative emotion and retaliatory aggression. It is worth noting that earlier research on this topic has examined other types of face threats, such as lack of verbal recognition (Kennedy-Lightsey, 2010) or negative threats to face, which question or limit a person’s autonomy (Dillard & Shen, 2005; Rains, 2013). This study built on this foundation by examining rejection and criticism specifically as positive face threats and testing a mediation model to answer these core questions: Do threats to positive face directly or indirectly lead to negative emotion and retaliatory aggression?…”
Section: This Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite suggestions to include emotion in face threat and facework research (Craig, Tracy, & Spisak, 1986;Locher & Watts, 2005;Metts, 1992), few studies have linked face threat to emotion. Recently, Kennedy-Lightsey (2010) found that positive face threat elicited more negative emotional responses, including anger and frustration. In the current study, and consistent with predictions, face threats were also related to negative emotions, suggesting that the more face threatening the divorce, the more negative the emotional reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Face-threatening messages have been found to increase negative emotions. They hurt (Zhang & Stafford, 2008) and elicit anger, embarrassment, and anxiety (Cupach & Carson, 2002; Kennedy-Lightsey, 2010; Lin & Yamaguchi, 2011; Willer & Soliz, 2010). This holds for threats to negative as well as positive face.…”
Section: Face Threats Of Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%