2022
DOI: 10.12700/aph.19.4.2022.4.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of Toxicity of Reviews in Online Discussions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bagging is a decision tree-based ensemble method that generates multiple resampled training data by sampling subjects with replacement from training data, creates a decision tree from each resampled training data, and classi es the groups by combining decision trees through majority votes (Machová et al, 2006). The tuning parameters used in this model are the minimum number of subjects included in the nal node ("minbucket") and the maximum number of times allowed to overlap input variables used when creating decision trees ("maxdepth").…”
Section: Baggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bagging is a decision tree-based ensemble method that generates multiple resampled training data by sampling subjects with replacement from training data, creates a decision tree from each resampled training data, and classi es the groups by combining decision trees through majority votes (Machová et al, 2006). The tuning parameters used in this model are the minimum number of subjects included in the nal node ("minbucket") and the maximum number of times allowed to overlap input variables used when creating decision trees ("maxdepth").…”
Section: Baggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Α represents the weight and 𝐻 𝑚 (𝑑𝑖) = For the instance di, this is the prediction of the m th classifier [30].…”
Section: Bagging Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an instance, the random forest approach incorporates random decision trees along with bagging to acquire extremely elevated classifcation precision. Bagging attempts to execute parallel trainees on undersized sample inhabitants and then carries a norm of all the forecasts [48]. Bagging operates by integrating forecasts by voting, every model obtains equivalent signifcance "Idealized" interpretation: Model several training groups of size n and then create a classifer for each training group and connect the classifers' forecasts [49].…”
Section: Bagging Classifermentioning
confidence: 99%