1988
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90119-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of the DNA helix stabilizing anthramycin-N2 guanine adduct by UVRABC nuclease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the former case, no effect of supercoiling was detected (Fig. 5), whereas in the latter case, it is the relaxed modified DNA that is cut more efficiently than the supercoiled DNA (19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the former case, no effect of supercoiling was detected (Fig. 5), whereas in the latter case, it is the relaxed modified DNA that is cut more efficiently than the supercoiled DNA (19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These DNase I footprinting results are consistent with the UvrABC nuclease system incision efficiency for these two BPDE-DNA adducts. It has been suggested that the UvrABC nuclease complex generally recognizes a localized DNA helix alteration including bending, kinking, and unwinding rather than a specific modified nucleotide [Van Houten et al, 1986;Walter et al, 1988;and reviewed in Van Houten (1990)l. The BPDE-DNA adducts have different effects on the thermostability of 1 lmer duplexes such that the T m of the unmodified 1 lmer is 50.5 OC, whereas the Tm' S for the (+)-and (-)-trans isomers are 40 and 43.2 OC, respectively (Ya et al, 1994).…”
Section: Bpde-dna Adduct Recognition and Repair: Structure-function Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is the case, then it is expected that the UvrABC incision of an ICL dG-MC-dG lesion will be different since this type of lesion does not cause DNA kinking or bending and either DNA strand can wrap around UvrB molecules. The signal for UvrA binding at this ICL lesion probably comes from the changing helix fluidity caused by this type of lesion (39). Our gel retardation results indicate that UvrA remains bound to the MC-modified DNA fragments after addition of UvrB and UvrC proteins; this differs from the results of van Houten et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%