2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of pigment network pattern in dermoscopy images based on fuzzy classification of pixels

Abstract: The main contribution of this method is the very design of the algorithm, highly innovative, which could also be used to deal with other pattern recognition problems of a similar nature. Other contributions are: 1. The good performance in discriminating between the pattern and the disturbing artefacts -which means that no prior preprocessing is required in this method- and between the pattern and other dermoscopic patterns; 2. It puts forward a new methodological approach for work of this kind, introducing the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall accuracy of the model was 76.5% with sensitivity of 96.3% and specificity of 89.5%. Garcia Arroyo et al [ 15 ] presented an algorithm based on machine learning and used 875 dermoscopic images. The images were collected from the Interactive Atlas of Dermoscopy dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall accuracy of the model was 76.5% with sensitivity of 96.3% and specificity of 89.5%. Garcia Arroyo et al [ 15 ] presented an algorithm based on machine learning and used 875 dermoscopic images. The images were collected from the Interactive Atlas of Dermoscopy dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 A similar system was proposed and analyzed where network of pigments within dermoscopic images were classified. 32 A large database comprising of 875 images was acquired and a fuzzy classifier was applied that helped to generate a fuzzy classification model from the values of labeled pixels. These values in turn helped in the extraction of features such as color and texture and these further retrieved different categories of results including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system achieved an accuracy of 88%, sensitivity of 90.17% and specificity of 83.44%, and an AUC of 0.912. 32 A comparison can be drawn between these two studies and an inference can be made regarding the use of fuzzy classifier as an efficient, reliable, and robust mechanism that enables classification of both skin lesion boundaries in order to diagnose Melanoma as well as detect pigment networks in dermoscopic images. 32 Another inference that can be made relates to the sample size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This part of the thesis was mostly focused on comparing classification methods and investigating which machine learning method delivers the best results. A number of different classifiers have been utilised, with neural networks, support vector machines and discriminant analysis achieving the highest accuracy (d'Amico et al, 2004;Arroyo and Zapirain, 2014;Blanzieri et al, 2000;Celebi et al, 2009;Dreiseitl et al, 2001;Garcia-Arroyo and Garcia-Zapirain, 2018;Grana et al, 2003;Maglogiannis et al, 2001Maglogiannis et al, , 2005Maglogiannis and Kosmopoulos, 2006;Maglogiannis and Zafiropoulos, 2004;Messadi et al, 2009;Nasir et al, 2018;Rahman and Bhattacharya, 2010;Sadeghi et al, 2011;Serrano and Acha, 2009;Tanaka et al, 2004;Yuan et al, 2006;Zhang et al, 2003). Other groups were concerned mostly about the feature extraction step, using statistical methods and supervised learning to lower the feature level, to achieve better performance on classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%