2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2012.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognition of individual knobby sea stars Protoreaster nodosus (L., 1758) using aboral surface characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Caorsi et al (2012) found 99.4% of correct matches in naked-eye photo-identification of an anuran species based on ventral color pattern, 90.9% using computer-assisted photo-identification and 95.3% using toe-clipping method. Furthermore, our results are comparable with Chim & Tan (2012) study, which found respectively 87% and 100% of correct matches for computer-assisted and naked-eye photo evaluations of a sea star species based on tubercle patterns. Our results therefore indicate that photo-identification is a suitable method for individual identification in R. aequalicuspis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Caorsi et al (2012) found 99.4% of correct matches in naked-eye photo-identification of an anuran species based on ventral color pattern, 90.9% using computer-assisted photo-identification and 95.3% using toe-clipping method. Furthermore, our results are comparable with Chim & Tan (2012) study, which found respectively 87% and 100% of correct matches for computer-assisted and naked-eye photo evaluations of a sea star species based on tubercle patterns. Our results therefore indicate that photo-identification is a suitable method for individual identification in R. aequalicuspis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Knox et al, 2013;Sreekar et al, 2013) and even invertebrates (e.g. Chim & Tan, 2012;Caci et al, 2013). Photo-identification has been extensively applied for studying marine mammals (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photo-identification vouchers of the aboral surface of individuals [23] were taken prior to release of the animals, to prevent repeat genetic sampling of the same individual.
Figure 1.Locations of Protoreaster nodosus populations from Singapore and Crandall et al .
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the early days of taxonomy, species descriptions have been accompanied by various types of visual support that are vital to convey information about the morphology and character states used to distinguish species (Akkari et al 2015, García-Melo et al 2018. Currently, the use of digital images in taxonomy has focused on photo-identification methods (Dala-Corte et al 2016) in studies of large vertebrates (Bertulli et al 2015;Koivuniemi et al 2016;Treilibs et al 2016), amphibians (Sannolo et al 2016), lizards (Sreekar et al 2013;Knox et al 2016), invertebrates (Caci et al 2013, Chim & Tan 2012, fishes (Speed et al 2007;Dala-Corte et al 2016), and bats (Rydell & Russo 2014). Few works, however, have attempted to standardize protocols for field photography to provide images that are taxonomically informative for scientific publications and aesthetically attractive for disseminating knowledge and promoting biodiversity conservation to a broader constituency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%