2007
DOI: 10.1080/00952990701653842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal Influence of Parent Discipline and Child's Behavior on Risk for Substance Use Disorder: A Nine-Year Prospective Study

Abstract: The reciprocal prediction between son's ND and father's punishment and prediction of father's punishment by mother's punishment point to the need for family-based interventions that take into account the quality of specific dyadic interactions pertaining to discipline behaviors that amplify the risk for SUD in male children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some have suggested that father discipline toward his son contributes to risk for later substance use disorder [38] more so than mothers. Additionally, mother communication was negatively associated with late adolescent alcohol use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have suggested that father discipline toward his son contributes to risk for later substance use disorder [38] more so than mothers. Additionally, mother communication was negatively associated with late adolescent alcohol use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low prevalence of drug use may have hindered the detection of additional significant relationships between parenting styles and substance use. On the other hand, and contrary to previous studies with Spanish adolescents, our study has a longitudinal design that controls for possible reciprocal influences between initial drug use and parenting styles (Mezzich et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast with Anglo-Saxon studies, two studies showed that besides authoritative parenting, the indulgent style also functions as a protective factor for adolescent substance use (García & Gracia, 2010;Gracia, Fuentes, García, & Lila, 2012). Moreover, two studies found better outcomes for adolescents under the indulgent style than the authoritative one (García & Gracia, 2009;Martínez, Fuentes, García, & Madrid, 2013). However, these results must be interpreted with caution due to the cross-sectional nature which limits the interpretation of the possible causal relationship between parenting styles and adolescent drug use (Becoña et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Parenting is a well-established risk/protective factor for development of more general forms of adolescent and adult psychopathology, including risk for substance use disorder (Andersson & Eisemann, 2003; Baumrind, 1991; Blackson, Tarter, & Mezzich, 1996; Chassin et al, 2005; Chassin, Presson, Rose, & Sherman, 1998; Choquet, Hassler, Morin, Falissard, & Chau, 2008; Coombs & Landsverk, 1988; Enns, Cox, & Clara, 2002; King & Chassin, 2004; Marshal & Chassin, 2000; Mezzich et al, 2007; Parker & Benson, 2004; Pires & Jenkins, 2007; Wills, Resko, Ainette, & Mendoza, 2004). Parenting factors examined have included parenting style, (Baumrind, 1991) discipline, (Mezzich et al, 2007) monitoring, (Barnes, Hoffman, Welte, Farrell, & Dintcheff, 2006; Dick et al, 2007; Flannery, Williams, & Vazsonyi, 1999; Patock-Peckham, King, Morgan-Lopez, Ulloa, & Moses, 2011) and responsiveness or measures of parental warmth/coldness (Kendler, Myers, & Prescott, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parenting factors examined have included parenting style, (Baumrind, 1991) discipline, (Mezzich et al, 2007) monitoring, (Barnes, Hoffman, Welte, Farrell, & Dintcheff, 2006; Dick et al, 2007; Flannery, Williams, & Vazsonyi, 1999; Patock-Peckham, King, Morgan-Lopez, Ulloa, & Moses, 2011) and responsiveness or measures of parental warmth/coldness (Kendler, Myers, & Prescott, 2000). Some studies have suggested that monitoring is the dimension of parenting with the strongest effect on risk for SUD (Barnes & Farrell, 1992; Griffin, Botvin, Scheier, Diaz, & Miller, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%