2009
DOI: 10.1029/2008gc002171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent volcanic events and the distribution of hydrothermal venting at the Lucky Strike hydrothermal field, Mid‐Atlantic Ridge

Abstract: [1] We present new high-resolution bathymetry and backscatter data acquired in 2006 with the ROV Victor 6000 over the Lucky Strike hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge. As long-term monitoring of the Lucky Strike area (MoMAR project) is being implemented, these new high-resolution data offer an unprecedented view of the distribution of hydrothermal edifices, eruptive facies, and small-scale tectonic features in the Lucky Strike vent field. We show that vents located in the NW and NE correspond with wide expa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than 20 sulphide edifices are distributed around a large central lava lake (Ondréas et al, 2009) with a magmatic chamber located at 3 km depth (Singh et al, 2006). The hydrothermal fluids of LS are strongly controlled by geological settings in four areas (north-western, north-eastern, south-western and south-eastern areas), with the source of the south-eastern region being different from the three others (Barreyre et al, 2012).…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 20 sulphide edifices are distributed around a large central lava lake (Ondréas et al, 2009) with a magmatic chamber located at 3 km depth (Singh et al, 2006). The hydrothermal fluids of LS are strongly controlled by geological settings in four areas (north-western, north-eastern, south-western and south-eastern areas), with the source of the south-eastern region being different from the three others (Barreyre et al, 2012).…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study we use the eight best-quality, high-temperature (T > 200 • C) exit- Barreyre et al, 2014) to estimate the phase lag, ϕ T , between discharge temperature and bottom pressure at tidal periods. We estimate coherency and phase lag by applying multi-taper (Thomson, 1982) cross-spectral methods with adaptive weighting (Percival and Walden, 1993) to yearlong temperature and pressure records sampled either at 90 s or 24 min intervals. Uncertainties in the phase lag parameter are calculated by jackknifing the independent phase estimates obtained for each of the orthogonal tapers (values are given in Table 1, estimated for all the semi-diurnal tidal constituents).…”
Section: Phase Lag Between Tidal Forcing and Exit-fluid Thermal Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistics-Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and cluster analyses were performed with the Vegan package (Oksanen et al 2008) in R (version 2.8, R Development Core Team 2008), while correlations and significance tests were carried out in Statistica 6 (StatSoft 2001). We used NMDS because, in addition to its robustness, it can find nonlinear and nonmetric relationships.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%