Volume 3: Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Combustion and Fuels; Oil and Gas Applications; Cycle Innovations 1990
DOI: 10.1115/90-gt-058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Test Results in the Direct Coal-Fired 80 MW Combustion Turbine Program

Abstract: Under sponsorship of the Morgantown Energy Technology Center of the Department of Energy, the Westinghouse Electric Corporation and Avco Research Laboratory/Textron (ARL) are developing a direct coal-fired 80-MW combustion turbine. This is to be an element in a 207-MW direct coal-fired combustion turbine combined cycle, comprising another combustion turbine, a heat-recovery steam generator, and a steam turbine. Following conceptual and economic studies, the first experimental task has been to develop a direct … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has to be done quickly, as Ca504 is not stable at the elevated temperature present in the rich-zone. As discussed previously, 90% sulfur capture has been measured in gases leaving the subscale combustor primary zone but measurements in the lean-zone exit, the crucial location, might show only a 10 percent sulfur capture (Bannister et al, 1990). This is due to sulfur in the form of SO 2 escaping from the slag or sorbent after initial capture.…”
Section: Sulfur Capturementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has to be done quickly, as Ca504 is not stable at the elevated temperature present in the rich-zone. As discussed previously, 90% sulfur capture has been measured in gases leaving the subscale combustor primary zone but measurements in the lean-zone exit, the crucial location, might show only a 10 percent sulfur capture (Bannister et al, 1990). This is due to sulfur in the form of SO 2 escaping from the slag or sorbent after initial capture.…”
Section: Sulfur Capturementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The 12 MMBtu/hr (12.7 MMkJ/hr) slagging combustor, operating at 6 atm and 7 lb/sec (3.2 kg/sec) flow, simulates one Westinghouse W501 combustor having a 70 MMBtu/hr (74 MMkJ/hr) thermal rating (Loftus et al,19E19). Tested at Textron's Haverhill, Massachusetts facility, the interior of this combustor has been described previously (Bannister et al, 1990).…”
Section: Breakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gasifier vessel geometry, and the coal and air injection configurations are designed so that mixing is very intense, forming a stable toroidal vortex within the vessel, and the temperature is high enough (1650 0 to 1950°C) to efficiently gasify coal and to generate slag from the coal ash and sorbent. A slag layer deposits on the inner vessel walls, forming a protective layer for the water-cooled gasifier vessel (Bannister et aL, 1990). Molten slag drains continuously downward along the wall and exits with the fuel gas through a nozzle that is directed onto an impact target in the slag separation vessel The molten slag collected on the target drains to the bottom of the separator vessel, passing into a slag, water-quench vessel.…”
Section: Rgure 2-dc!' Power System Arrangementmentioning
confidence: 99%