2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00376-012-1200-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress in studies of climate change in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
80
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
80
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with results reported in previous studies (e.g. Ren et al 2012). Mean temperature responses to ALL, GHG, ANT, and NAT were characterized by warming trends.…”
Section: Observations and Model Data Processingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These findings are consistent with results reported in previous studies (e.g. Ren et al 2012). Mean temperature responses to ALL, GHG, ANT, and NAT were characterized by warming trends.…”
Section: Observations and Model Data Processingsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Such studies have emphasized three important periods: the Medieval Warm Period (MWP), the Little Ice Age (LIA) and the Current Warm Period (CWP). In the last 10 years, there has been great progress in research on historical climate changes in China [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Time series of historical climate changes in China have been reconstructed, with the length of some series being 1000 years or more.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five categories of methods can be used to estimate climate elasticity (Sankarasubramanian et al, 2001). The analytical derivation method has been widely used in many studies because it is clear in theory and does not need a large amount of historical observed data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches to investigate the impacts of annual runoff on climate change, including hydrologic models (Yang et al, 1998;Arnold et al, 1998;Yang et al, 2000;Arnold and Fohrer, 2005), the climate elasticity method (Schaake, 1990;Sankarasubramanian et al, 2001), and the statistics method (Vogel et al, 1999). The climate elasticity method, which has the advantage of requiring only the mean and trend of climate and basin variables and not requiring extensive historical measurements, was widely used in quantifying the effects of climatic factors on runoff, such as in the Yellow River basin (Zheng et al, 2009;Yang and Yang, 2011), the Luan River basin (Xu et al, 2013), the Chao-Bai River basin (Ma et al, 2010), and the Hai River basin (Ma et al, 2008;Yang and Yang, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%