2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2011.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments on membranes for post-combustion carbon capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission from the fossil fuel combustion is one of the main reasons for global warming, and therefore there is a significant need of developing technologies for CO 2 separation from flue gas. Membrane separation is an energy-efficient and cost-effective alternative [1][2][3][4][5][6] to the conventional technologies including absorption processes using aminebased solvents, adsorption processes employing solid adsorbents, and cryogenic distillation. The membrane transport performance for CO 2 /N 2 separation from flue gas is mainly characterized by two parameters, the CO 2 permeance and the CO 2 /N 2 selectivity [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emission from the fossil fuel combustion is one of the main reasons for global warming, and therefore there is a significant need of developing technologies for CO 2 separation from flue gas. Membrane separation is an energy-efficient and cost-effective alternative [1][2][3][4][5][6] to the conventional technologies including absorption processes using aminebased solvents, adsorption processes employing solid adsorbents, and cryogenic distillation. The membrane transport performance for CO 2 /N 2 separation from flue gas is mainly characterized by two parameters, the CO 2 permeance and the CO 2 /N 2 selectivity [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a high-energy penalty and the need for the safe disposal of hazardous by-products resulting from solvent degradation make aminebased absorption less attractive for CCC (Rao and Rubin, 2002). Other alternatives for CCC include absorption using chilled ammonia (Bandyopadhyay, 2011;Figueroa et al, 2008) or alkali metal carbonates (Liang et al, 2004;Samanta et al, 2011), membranes (Ramasubramanian and Ho, 2011;Van Der Sluijs et al, 1992), and adsorption (Agarwal et al, 2008(Agarwal et al, , 2010Haghpanah et al, 2013a,b). Zhao et al (2013) reviewed four technologies for post-combustion CCC: (1) chilled ammoniabased scrubbing, (2) alkali-metal carbonate-based scrubbing, (3) membrane separation, and (4) calcium looping based absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be stressed that for these membranes the transport is different from the solution-diffusion mechanism which takes place in dense polymeric membranes. These membranes are known to show high selectivities together with high fluxes (Ebner and Ritter, 2009;Luis et al, 2012;Ramasubramanian and Winston Ho, 2011;Xomeritakis et al, 2005). They can be divided into two categories: Fixed Site Carrier Membranes (FSCM) where the carriers are chemically bonded to the polymer and mobile site carrier membranes, usually named Liquid Membranes (LM) where the carrier can diffuse in the membrane.…”
Section: Facilated Transport Membranes (Ftm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overview of membrane characteristics and performances described above shows that impressive improvements have been recently achieved for the CO 2 /N 2 separation challenge (Ramasubramanian and Winston Ho, 2011). It should be stressed however that most studies concern sample materials tested at the lab scale, with pure gases, leading to ideal selectivity data; experiments with gas mixtures and/or humid feeds, in order to better mimic real flue gas conditions, are scarce.…”
Section: Facilated Transport Membranes (Ftm)mentioning
confidence: 99%