1987
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fl.19.010187.002531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Developments in Rapid-Distortion Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, with decreasing height, the inverse turbulent Prandtl number (Prt ' = KH / KJ,J) increases from around 1.1 in the near-neutral inertial sublayer (Garratt, 1992) to around 2 just above z = h. Finally, in the canopy layer below z = h, observations of KM and I<H become very erratic, often exhibiting singularities and regions of negative values. This behaviour is associated with observations of countergradient fluxes within canopies (Denmead and Bradley, 1985;1987), indicating that the turbulent transfer process is essentially nonlocal and cannot be described by a local gradient-diffusion relationship. Reasons for this behaviour can be advanced in both an Eulerian framework (Finnigan and Raupach, 1987) and a Lagrangian framework (Raupach, 1989), the latter offering a fairly straightforward replacement for a gradient-diffusion theory of turbulent transfer within canopies.…”
Section: Eddy Diffusivitiessupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, with decreasing height, the inverse turbulent Prandtl number (Prt ' = KH / KJ,J) increases from around 1.1 in the near-neutral inertial sublayer (Garratt, 1992) to around 2 just above z = h. Finally, in the canopy layer below z = h, observations of KM and I<H become very erratic, often exhibiting singularities and regions of negative values. This behaviour is associated with observations of countergradient fluxes within canopies (Denmead and Bradley, 1985;1987), indicating that the turbulent transfer process is essentially nonlocal and cannot be described by a local gradient-diffusion relationship. Reasons for this behaviour can be advanced in both an Eulerian framework (Finnigan and Raupach, 1987) and a Lagrangian framework (Raupach, 1989), the latter offering a fairly straightforward replacement for a gradient-diffusion theory of turbulent transfer within canopies.…”
Section: Eddy Diffusivitiessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Rapid Distortion Theory (RDT), reviewed by Townsend (1976), Savill (1987) and Hunt and Carruthers (1990) offers some explanation for the differences in statistical flow properties between mixing layers and boundary layers, and thence 371 for the behaviour of these properties in canopy flow near z = h. RDT uses the linearised equations of motion to calculate what happens to an initially specified turbulent velocity field under various kinds of meamflow distortion, specified in our case by U(z). In this respect RDT differs from 'HIST (another linearised theory), which seeks the fastest-growing eigenmodes or resonant modes of the flow.…”
Section: Tests Based Onstatistical Flowpropertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the characteristics method has been used in the context of rapid distortion theory for analyzing the fluid turbulence 6 and in the eikonal representation of the ballooning mode stability. 7 If we can treat the non-Hermitian part of the whole operator as a singular perturbation to a Hermitian operator, 8,9 we may be able to construct the theory in the framework of the perturbation theory for the operator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is a representation of the spatial structure of the turbulence, guided by the rapid distortion solution for initially isotropic turbulence in mean shear (Townsend 1980) and consistent with the one-dimensional wavenumber cospectrum equation [(1)]. The rapid distortion solution provides a dynamically consistent framework and has proven successful, in spite of its simplicity, in other contexts (e.g., Savill 1987;Hunt and Carruthers 1990;Cambon and Scott 1999). The second model element is the Lumley and Terray (1983) mapping of the spatial structure of the turbulence to the temporal fluctuations measured by fixed sensors in the presence of waves, adapted to the difference between measurements obtained by two fixed sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%