2019
DOI: 10.1145/3331033.3331039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments in prophet inequalities

Abstract: The classic prophet inequality states that, when faced with a finite sequence of non-negative independent random variables, a gambler who knows their distribution and is allowed to stop the sequence at any time, can obtain, in expectation, at least half as much reward as a prophet who knows the values of each random variable and can choose the largest one. Following this classic theorem from the 70s, many results have been obtained for several related optimal stopping problems. Moreover, the recently uncovered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the more general settings of the prophet inequality, the assumption that the random variables are identically distributed is discarded, and each random variable is allowed to be drawn from a different known distribution (for a recent survey see [6]). The single sample prophet inequality (see [1] for example) relaxes the assumption that the distributions are known.…”
Section: Further Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the more general settings of the prophet inequality, the assumption that the random variables are identically distributed is discarded, and each random variable is allowed to be drawn from a different known distribution (for a recent survey see [6]). The single sample prophet inequality (see [1] for example) relaxes the assumption that the distributions are known.…”
Section: Further Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is enough to prove that a(r * ) − 1+r * 8 ≥ a(r * )/2, which is equivalent to 4a(r * ) ≥ 1 + r * . If we replace a(r * ) with the explicit formula in the right hand of Equation (7) and rearrange terms, we obtain the inequality 3 − 4 ln(2) ≥ r * (5 − 6 ln (2)). Note that this is satisfied with equality by r * .…”
Section: P(algmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on reviewing papers that either study the prophet secretary problem or derive prophet inequalities based on the number of units k, and summarize the results most related to ours in Table 1. For a more expansive survey of prophet inequalities, we refer to Correa et al (2018).…”
Section: Literature Review and Comparison Of Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%