2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2108.12893
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tight Guarantees for Static Threshold Policies in the Prophet Secretary Problem

Abstract: In the prophet secretary problem, n values are drawn independently from known distributions, and presented in random order. A decision-maker must accept or reject each value when it is presented, and may accept at most k values in total. The objective is to maximize the expected sum of accepted values.We study the performance of static threshold policies, which accept the first k values exceeding a fixed threshold (or all such values, if fewer than k exist). We show that using an optimal threshold guarantees a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude this section by noting that Theorem 3 covers the result of Arnosti and Ma [2021] that establishes 1 − e −m m m m! for a single threshold and a more involved proof technique than our analysis.…”
Section: Approximations Using Balanced Thresholds For Multiple Itemsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We conclude this section by noting that Theorem 3 covers the result of Arnosti and Ma [2021] that establishes 1 − e −m m m m! for a single threshold and a more involved proof technique than our analysis.…”
Section: Approximations Using Balanced Thresholds For Multiple Itemsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…rewards (or the homogeneous prophet secretary problem) with a static policy when the decision-maker can collect m rewards. This problem has been studied in Yan [2011] and Arnosti and Ma [2021], where the authors establish the existence of a distribution for rewards such that no single threshold policy can achieve better than 1 − e −m m m m! of the optimal expected reward, and show this approximation factor can be achieved by a single threshold.…”
Section: Main Results 3 (Informal)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Proph(I) can also be constructed (see Arnosti and Ma (2021)). However, these upper bounds for static threshold policies relative to the weaker prophet benchmark require a complicated family of examples with messy calculations, whereas our framework elegantly establishes the tightness of the ratio E[min{Bin(n,k/n),k}] k without needing to construct any counterexamples.…”
Section: St(i)mentioning
confidence: 99%