Recent developments and current controversies in short-stay endovascular aneurysm repair

Preece, Ryan; Stenson, Kristina; Shaw, Sarah; Budge, James; Patterson, Benjamin O.; Holt, Peter; Loftus, Ian

doi:10.23736/s0021-9509.19.10952-4

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mortality rate was 0 to 1% and hospital readmission was 0 to 6%. 39 A study of 100 consecutive same-day outpatient EVAR procedures selected for asymptomatic patients who were expected to undergo minimally complex EVAR procedures and who live within 60 minutes of a hospital and had supervision at home for the first 24 hours. Four percent of this highly selected group ended up hospitalized for access vessel complications.…”

Section: Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Percutaneous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Current Status and Future Trends

Watts

2020

Semin intervent Radiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a common, safe, and effective method of treating abdominal aortic aneurysms. Traditionally treated via surgical cutdown over the common femoral arteries, many recent studies demonstrate percutaneous access techniques to avoid the surgical cutdown. Developing familiarity with these percutaneous techniques, including risks, complications, adjuncts, and alternative accesses, can help improve the outcomes and availability of EVAR. As these techniques become increasingly common, it is not unlikely that they can be practiced safely in select patients in an outpatient setting.

show abstract

Section: Future Directionsmentioning

confidence: 99%