1999
DOI: 10.1097/00075197-199907000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent advances in the placement of tubes for enteral nutrition

Abstract: Enteral nutrition is the preferred route for nutritional support compared with parenteral nutrition if the gastrointestinal tract is functionally preserved. Long-standing nasogastric or nasoenteric feeding tubes are not well tolerated. Alternative routes are gastrostomy and jejunostomy. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy or those guided by fluoroscopy, sonography or tomography should be the first choices. Laparoscopy or laparotomy gastrostomy/jejunostomy routes should be reserved for specific situ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as noted by Humphreys and Najmaldin, 14 laparoscopy enables tube placement by allowing direct visualization of the stomach. In other works, authors conveyed that a laparoscopically placed button may be a feasible alternative to PEG for initiation of enteral feeding when anatomical challenges are present, 15 , 16 such as obstructed oropharynx, esophagus, or gastric cardia 16 . The procedure has been associated with no intraoperative complications (n = 2 patients 17 and n = 240 18 ), minor infections and hypergranulation (n = 11 14 ), and postoperative complications 18 (wound infections, button dislodgement secondary to balloon rupture, and a button not fully placed into the stomach).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as noted by Humphreys and Najmaldin, 14 laparoscopy enables tube placement by allowing direct visualization of the stomach. In other works, authors conveyed that a laparoscopically placed button may be a feasible alternative to PEG for initiation of enteral feeding when anatomical challenges are present, 15 , 16 such as obstructed oropharynx, esophagus, or gastric cardia 16 . The procedure has been associated with no intraoperative complications (n = 2 patients 17 and n = 240 18 ), minor infections and hypergranulation (n = 11 14 ), and postoperative complications 18 (wound infections, button dislodgement secondary to balloon rupture, and a button not fully placed into the stomach).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, complications have been reported [1], and aspiration is one of the most important and controversial ones. In patients on enteral nutrition, aspiration may lead to devastating consequences, interfering with the outcome of medical treatment and sometimes causing death [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first description of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) by Gauderer in 1980 [1], various minimally invasive techniques of gastrostomy insertion have been developed, including image-guided gastrostomy (IG) inserted under fluoroscopic guidance [2,3]. Although both PEG and IG have the benefits of easy insertion and avoidance of a laparotomy incision, complications have been reported with these techniques, including gastrocolic fistula, hemorrhage, and intraabdominal leak with sepsis [4][5][6][7]. In this study, we aim to evaluate the clinical outcome of both procedures and the associated complications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%