2008
DOI: 10.2307/20445445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recalling Taboo and Nontaboo Words

Abstract: People remember emotional and taboo words better than neutral words. It is well known that words that are processed at a deep (i.e., semantic) level are recalled better than words processed at a shallow (i.e., purely visual) level. To determine how depth of processing influences recall of emotional and taboo words, a levels of processing paradigm was used. Whether this effect holds for emotional and taboo words has not been previously investigated. Two experiments demonstrated that taboo and emotional words be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
55
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was an advantageous effect where valence improved memory, in this case explicit memory. The present results are somewhat inconsistent with some of the previous studies which have found an advantage of positive emotion over negative ones (D'Argembeau et al, 2005;White, 2002;Jay et al, 2008). Here, we found that both positive and negative words increased memory.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It was an advantageous effect where valence improved memory, in this case explicit memory. The present results are somewhat inconsistent with some of the previous studies which have found an advantage of positive emotion over negative ones (D'Argembeau et al, 2005;White, 2002;Jay et al, 2008). Here, we found that both positive and negative words increased memory.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It was expected that, consistent with much previous research (e.g., Harris et al, 2003;Jay et al, 2008;Kensinger & Corkin, 2004), taboo words would be rated as more arousing than either emotionally valenced or emotionally neutral words. Currently, no imageability data are available for taboo words, although some exist for valenced nontaboo words (see, e.g., Altarriba & Bauer, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Evidence informing theories of cognitive architecture associated language processing suggest that taboo terms receive more shallow processing than neutral terms even though taboo expressions tend to be the easier to recall [22]. The cultural specificity of taboo bursts in Tourette's is noteworthy [2].…”
Section: B Observations On the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%