2015
DOI: 10.5588/pha.15.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasons for the low bacteriological coverage of tuberculosis reported in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa

Abstract: Both poor clinical practice (especially in hospitals) and poor record keeping have contributed to the low bacteriological coverage reported. These shortcomings need to be addressed to improve patient care and programme management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Western Cape study reported 17% of smear positive cases not being reported and started on treatment [8] while studies performed in Gauteng and Kwazulu-Natal reported around 20% of cases not being recorded in the TB register [9, 10]. Other studies found that the accuracy and completeness of data in the TB treatment register linked with the central laboratory data were inadequate and that a high number of bacteriologically confirmed cases were not included in the TB register [11, 12]. A recent study in 2015 reported on a national evaluation of the ETR.net for a period in 2009 and found that not all TB diagnosed patients were captured and the completeness and reliability of the electronic data was inconsistent across different data sources [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Western Cape study reported 17% of smear positive cases not being reported and started on treatment [8] while studies performed in Gauteng and Kwazulu-Natal reported around 20% of cases not being recorded in the TB register [9, 10]. Other studies found that the accuracy and completeness of data in the TB treatment register linked with the central laboratory data were inadequate and that a high number of bacteriologically confirmed cases were not included in the TB register [11, 12]. A recent study in 2015 reported on a national evaluation of the ETR.net for a period in 2009 and found that not all TB diagnosed patients were captured and the completeness and reliability of the electronic data was inconsistent across different data sources [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2018, the bacteriological diagnostic rate for Africa was 65% (3) which is higher than that of Katsina state and half of the LGAs in the state in 2018 and 2019. Similar studies conducted in other lowand middle-income countries attribute low bacteriological diagnostic rates to improper documentation, improper referral, the inability of the presumptive case to produce sputum, overworked laboratory staff, stockouts of the commodities required to perform the test, and faulty equipment (32)(33)(34). The decrease in bacteriological diagnostic rate over the years in combination with identification of an increasing number of presumptive cases accessing care in the limited diagnostic facilities whose number remained relatively unchanged over the three years, suggests that ©PAGEPRESS PUBLICATIONS MILAHAM ET AL. the available diagnostic resources were insufficient for the increased demand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Further, our study found that sputum smear test coverage and the percentage of sputum smear positive cases decreased in 2020 (n = 60 tests, 15.1% of the total number of cases in that year where 76.7% of cases were sputum smear positive) compared to 2010 (n = 189 tests, 49.2% of the total cases in that year where 92.1% of cases were sputum smear positive). Other studies have shown that sputum smear test coverage and positivity rate are universally low in children (average of 6.8% sputum smear positivity) compared to adults (average of 52.0% sputum smear positivity) (Mngomezulu et al 2015;Kunkel et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%