2008
DOI: 10.5172/ijtr.6.1.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reasons For Non-completion And Dissatisfaction Among Apprentices And Trainees: A Regional Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Student satisfaction has been identified as a predictor of completion outcomes in previous studies (Snell and Hart 2008;McInnis et al 2000;Yorke et al 1997;Scott et al 1996). We hypothesised that this inclination may be also exist in our present study.…”
Section: Data and Data Preparationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Student satisfaction has been identified as a predictor of completion outcomes in previous studies (Snell and Hart 2008;McInnis et al 2000;Yorke et al 1997;Scott et al 1996). We hypothesised that this inclination may be also exist in our present study.…”
Section: Data and Data Preparationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Poor working conditions, lack of workplace support for learning, and a failure by the employer or workplace to provide training contribute to non-completion of apprenticeship (Snell & Hart, 2008). In a case study, Filliettaz (2010) demonstrated how both individual contributions from an apprentice and his workplace trainers' failure to move beyond a work production focus caused the workplace relationship between apprentice and trainer to deteriorate, eventually leading to the apprentice's discontinuance of apprenticeship.…”
Section: Work or Organisational Influencesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Apprenticeship retention and completion rates have been challenging in New Zealand (NZ; Jeffcoat & Jeffcoat, 2006) and other countries including Australia (Harris et al, 2001;Snell & Hart, 2008), Canada (Coe, 2013) and Switzerland (Filliettaz, 2010;Masdonati, 2010). Completion rates of NZ apprentices are variable across a range of industry sectors (''Many apprentices never qualify,'' 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can reflect the sector or size of the employer, or factors specific to an individual employer. The size of the employer can also impact the apprentice's motivation, where apprentices working for large employers see themselves in a stable and privileged position, with better terms and conditions relative to other apprentices and are less likely to drop-out (Snell & Hart, 2008). It may also be because the current training provision often does not fit the needs of SMEs (Johnson & Devins, 2008).…”
Section: Employer and Job-specific Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also be because the current training provision often does not fit the needs of SMEs (Johnson & Devins, 2008). The size of the employer can also impact the apprentice's motivation, where apprentices working for large employers see themselves in a stable and privileged position, with better terms and conditions relative to other apprentices and are less likely to drop-out (Snell & Hart, 2008). Large employers have been associated with higher levels of job security in Germany (Wagner, 1997), although recent evidence for this is less conclusive in Britain and France (Bryson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Employer and Job-specific Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%