1973
DOI: 10.1093/ee/2.2.223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rearing and Biology of the Horn Fly 1 in the Laboratory: Effects of Density on Survival and Fecundity of Adults 3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When Schmidt el al (116) varied cage size and density per cage of adult Haematobia irritans, they showed that hatchability of the eggs from more densely popula t ed cages was always higher. Because adult survival was better at lower densities, without reduction in numbers of eggs produced, 0.6-9.5 cm3 of space per fly was determined as optimal.…”
Section: Egg Hatchabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Schmidt el al (116) varied cage size and density per cage of adult Haematobia irritans, they showed that hatchability of the eggs from more densely popula t ed cages was always higher. Because adult survival was better at lower densities, without reduction in numbers of eggs produced, 0.6-9.5 cm3 of space per fly was determined as optimal.…”
Section: Egg Hatchabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the laboratory, Schmidt et al (1972) found 8that greater adult survival occurred in less densely populated cages with the optimum density from 0.6-9.5 cm per fly.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Developmen t. Schmidt et al (1972) noted a higher percent egg hatch in more densely populated laboratory cages.…”
Section: Bionomicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Following this report, many further attempts have been made to rear adult horn flies in the laboratory ( Schmidt et al . 1967 ; Schmidt et al . 1972 ; Bay & Harris 1978; Burg et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%