2015
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.067116-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reappraisal of the taxonomy of Streptococcus suis serotypes 20, 22 and 26: Streptococcus parasuis sp. nov.

Abstract: In order to clarify the taxonomic position of serotypes 20, 22 and 26 of Streptococcus suis, biochemical and molecular genetic studies were performed on isolates (SUT-7, SUT-286 T , SUT-319, SUT-328 and SUT-380) reacted with specific antisera of serotypes 20, 22 or 26 from the saliva of healthy pigs as well as reference strains of serotypes 20, 22 and 26. Comparative recN gene sequencing showed high genetic relatedness among our isolates, but marked differences from the type strain S. suis NCTC 10234 T , i.e. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
45
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(21 reference statements)
4
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Streptococcus orisratti strains originally classified as the reference strains for S. suis serotypes 32 (strain EA1172.91) and 34 (strain 92-2742) were not included in the present study (Hill et al, 2005). Although additional serotypes 20, 22 and 26 have recently been suggested to belong to a bacterial species different from S. suis (Nomoto et al, 2015;Tien le et al, 2013), these serotypes are still commonly isolated from diseased animals and considered as S. suis by diagnostic laboratories . For that reason, they have been included in the development of the present test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Streptococcus orisratti strains originally classified as the reference strains for S. suis serotypes 32 (strain EA1172.91) and 34 (strain 92-2742) were not included in the present study (Hill et al, 2005). Although additional serotypes 20, 22 and 26 have recently been suggested to belong to a bacterial species different from S. suis (Nomoto et al, 2015;Tien le et al, 2013), these serotypes are still commonly isolated from diseased animals and considered as S. suis by diagnostic laboratories . For that reason, they have been included in the development of the present test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, phylogenetic analyses of the 16S rRNA and chaperonin-60 (cpn60) genes showed that the reference strains of serotypes 32 and 34 should have been Streptococcus orisratti (Hill et al, 2005). More recent sequence analyses of genes encoding manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase (sodA) and the recombination/repair protein (recN) indicated that the reference strains of serotypes 20, 22, 26, and 33 need to be taxonomically removed from S. suis (Tien le et al, 2013), and serotypes 20, 22, and 26 was reappraised and proposed to be a novel species, Streptococcus parasuis (Nomoto et al, 2015). Notomi et al (2000) developed a nucleic acid amplification method called loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), the reaction which is performed under isothermal conditions with a set of four to six specially designed primers and can be accomplished in a single step without the need for advanced instruments (Mori and Notomi, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Later, S. suis serotypes 20, 22 and 26 were proposed to be Streptococcus parasuis sp. nov. (Nomoto et al, 2015), and S. suis serotype 33 was proposed to be Streptococcus ruminantium sp. nov. (Tohya et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%