Reanalysis of the Gronnerod (2003) Rorschach Temporal Stability Meta-Analysis Data Set

Relationship between the Rorschach Perceptual Thinking Index (PTI) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) in psychotic patients: A validity study

“…Previous studies have already demonstrated that the PTI variables are able to be used to differentiate between psychotic patients and healthy controls both in adults (Dao and Prevatt, 2006;Dao et al, 2008;Ilonen et al, 2010;Mihura et al, 2013;Benedik et al, 2013), and in adolescents (Smith et al, 2001); and that the PTI total score and the PANSS total score are significantly correlated (Dao and Prevatt, 2006). Moreover, previous meta-analyses reported high consistency of the Rorschach variable scores over time in longitudinal testing (Grønnerød, 2003;Grønnerød, 2006). In fact, the perceptual inaccuracy (X-%) and the disordered thinking (WSum6) variables showed retest correlations of 0.85 or higher, both at the one and three year retests in healthy adults and adolescents (Exner et al, 1985;Grønnerød, 2003;Grønnerød, 2006).…”

“…Moreover, previous meta-analyses reported high consistency of the Rorschach variable scores over time in longitudinal testing (Grønnerød, 2003;Grønnerød, 2006). In fact, the perceptual inaccuracy (X-%) and the disordered thinking (WSum6) variables showed retest correlations of 0.85 or higher, both at the one and three year retests in healthy adults and adolescents (Exner et al, 1985;Grønnerød, 2003;Grønnerød, 2006). In particular, severely mentally ill adolescents showed high correlations between initial and retest assessments in the perceptual and cognitive slippage inaccuracy variables, with values ranging from 0.72-0.87.…”

Self-Esteem, Tenure, and Narcissistic Leader's Performance

“…The Rorschach Inkblot Method and Comprehensive System have been criticized over the years (e.g., Garb, Wood, Lilienfeld, & Nezworski, 2005;Lilienfeld, Wood, & Garb, 2000;Wood, Nezworski, & Lilienfeld, 2003), but a considerable body of research confirms their validity, interrater reliability (Maccoby, 1997(Maccoby, , 2004Meyer, Mihura, & Smith, 2005), retest reliability (Grønnerød, , 2006, construct validity (Hunsley & Bailey, 1999;Lilienfeld et al, 2000;Weiner, 1997), and clinical utility (Meyer & Archer, 2001;Viglione & Hilsenroth, 2001;Weiner, 2001). Many studies also confirm the contrast between the selfreport instruments and performance-based test scores (Rorschach) (Archer & Krishnamurthy, 1993a, 1993bBornstein, 2002;Meyer, 1996;Viglione, 1996;Ganellen, 1996Ganellen, , 2001.…”

Psikanalitik Yönelimli Psikoterapi ile Takip Edilen Olgunun Projektif Testlerle Değerlendirilmesi: Terapi Öncesi ve Sonrası Uygulamaları.

“…Psikoterapi su reçlerinin deg erlendirilmesi uzun yıllardır o n test-son test uygulamaları ile o olçulmektedir. Konu projektif testler olunca alan yazın taramaları 1920'li yıllara kadar gerilemektedir (Grønnerød, 2004(Grønnerød, , 2006. Projektif testlerde kişiye sunulan malzemenin belirsizlig i ve yanıt serbestlig i onu dig er psikolojik testlerden ayıran temel o zelliktir.…”

“…Dig er taraftan tamamlayıcı olan her iki projektif yo ntemin terapi sonlandırıldıktan sonra olguya tekrar sunulması da hastanın terapo tik su reçten ne kadar fayda sag ladıg ını, terapinin işlevsellig inin ne kadar iyi oldug unu go sterebilecek bulguları sunacaktır (Garrison, 1948, Rosenweig, 1948, Krout ve ark. 1952, Weiner ve Exner, 1991, Exner ve Andronikof-Sanglade, 1992, Grønnerød, 2004, 2006, Fouques, 2004, Gaudriault, 2008, Musewicz ve ark. 2009, Rosenbaum ve ark., 2012, Saldanha ve ark, 2013, Manickam, 2013, Bram ve Yalof, 2015.…”