1983
DOI: 10.2307/1939979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reanalysis of Caswell's Neutral Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing against older but less flexible models such as the logseries or geometric which are known to fail to fit many datasets is weaker. Multiple mechanisms: Any given mathematical formulation of an SAD can be created by many different mechanisms, so fit to data cannot possibly be ultimate proof of a particular mechanism (Pielou 1975; McGill 2003a). For example, Cohen (1968) showed that multiple mechanisms lead to the broken stick, Boswell & Patil (1971) showed that multiple mechanisms lead to the logseries while Ugland & Gray (1983) showed that either niche‐based competition or neutrality can lead to neutral patterns and processes. It is well known to philosophers of science that similarity in pattern does not imply similarity in process, but ecologists seem to frequently forget it.…”
Section: Theoretical Developments In Sadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing against older but less flexible models such as the logseries or geometric which are known to fail to fit many datasets is weaker. Multiple mechanisms: Any given mathematical formulation of an SAD can be created by many different mechanisms, so fit to data cannot possibly be ultimate proof of a particular mechanism (Pielou 1975; McGill 2003a). For example, Cohen (1968) showed that multiple mechanisms lead to the broken stick, Boswell & Patil (1971) showed that multiple mechanisms lead to the logseries while Ugland & Gray (1983) showed that either niche‐based competition or neutrality can lead to neutral patterns and processes. It is well known to philosophers of science that similarity in pattern does not imply similarity in process, but ecologists seem to frequently forget it.…”
Section: Theoretical Developments In Sadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Multiple mechanisms: Any given mathematical formulation of an SAD can be created by many different mechanisms, so fit to data cannot possibly be ultimate proof of a particular mechanism (Pielou 1975;McGill 2003a). For example, Cohen (1968) showed that multiple mechanisms lead to the broken stick, Boswell & Patil (1971) showed that multiple mechanisms lead to the logseries while Ugland & Gray (1983) showed that either niche-based competition or neutrality can lead to neutral patterns and processes. It is well known to philosophers of science that similarity in pattern does not imply similarity in process, but ecologists seem to frequently forget it.…”
Section: Causes Of the Proliferationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that there has been some debate about whether certain models are truly neutral (e.g. Ugland & Gray 1983, Caswell 1983): we defer comment at this point. Here we are simply interested in the neutral model as an alternative, relatively sample-size independent measure of diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%