Really changing the course: the limitations of environmental management systems for innovation

Abstract

The paper broadens the scope of environmental management system (EMS) research by describing how EMSs can contribute to inertia in present production systems. In conjunction with other factors this inertia can inhibit dramatic shifts toward more sustainable technologies and systems. Our approach builds upon technological lockin theory, which focuses on market coordination and technological interdependencies as generators of inertia in technological systems. Building on this framework, we call attention to previously under appreciated non-market social forces and institutional structures that can further reinforce lock-in. We argue that the co-evolutionary mechanisms that generate increasing returns for physical technologies may also be applied to social technologies, such as management systems. The paper describes the emergence of 'EMS lock-in' as a path dependent evolution occurring within the context of the larger quality management paradigm. While EMS may initially produce improvements in environmental performance, EMS may also constrain organizational focus to the exploitation of present production systems, rather than exploring for superior innovations that are discontinuous. The paper questions the enthusiastic private and public sector support for EMS implementation and instead recommends an ambidextrous management approach that integrates foresight and broader stakeholder collaboration.

Rainforest Alliance Certification of Kenyan tea farms: a contribution to sustainability or tokenism?

“…It is believed that environmental concerns facing us today are indicators of both environmental and economic inefficiency. These concerns arise because many cost-effective environmental measures are inadequately exploited by managers (Könnölä & Unruh, 2006;Müller et al, 1997;Porter & Van der Linde, 1995). In response, EMSs of different types have been developed.…”

Post-Partnership Strategies for Defining Corporate Responsibility: The Business Social Compliance Initiative

“…Hence, even though current generations of actors may disagree with the definitions that certain artefacts support, the artefacts themselves are difficult to change, since doing so is often costly. This reasoning is very similar to the better-known reasoning underlying 'sunk costs' or 'technological lock-ins' , which make it costly and difficult to shift from unsustainable to sustainable technical systems (e.g., Dosi, 1982;Saether, 2000;Könnölä and Unruh, 2006).…”

Integrating the Weight of History into the Alignment Framework: The Case of Distributed Generation Technologies

“…This dominant design is enforced at the industry-wide level, due to the existence of network externalities and coordination effects that often require the creation of codified standards and conventions (Könnölä and Unruh, 2007).…”