2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2010.06.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realizing increased sub-pixel spatial resolution in X-ray imaging using displaced multiple images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tests using the six different filters have been carried out on X-Ray test images of a characterization object, normally used to determine the resolution of an imaging system. The images were taken in a similar manner to that in [2]. In order to provide a measure in relation to the performance of the filters, the results are stated as the percentage of blurring noise still remaining in the image after filtering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tests using the six different filters have been carried out on X-Ray test images of a characterization object, normally used to determine the resolution of an imaging system. The images were taken in a similar manner to that in [2]. In order to provide a measure in relation to the performance of the filters, the results are stated as the percentage of blurring noise still remaining in the image after filtering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance difference for a spatial and a frequency domain filter of the same type were indistinguishable, so only one line is shown for each type of filter. Figure 4 also shows the raw performance of the oversampling technique, as presented in [2] (figure 4a), in order to provide a relationship between the before and after filtering performance. Here, the number of linepairs/mm seen in the sub-pixel image is divided by the theoretical linepairs/mm of a full resolution image with the same number of pixels as the sub-pixel image, to demonstrate a relative performance quality of the oversampling technique.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous attempts to obtain sub-pixel resolution in x-ray imaging utilizing photon-counting or integrating detectors yielded a much smaller increase in resolution with saturation at higher raster-scanning parameters. This stems mostly from the fact that previous investigations on this topic did not model the spatial detection system response and incorporate an appropriate deconvolution step [20,21]. Most detectors available so far have a much wider gaussian-shaped PSF arising from charge sharing in directly converting sensors or lateral propagation of light in scintillators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bruandet & Dinten (1999) applied this method to the X-ray imaging field and improved the MTF of the imaging system (pixel size: 200 mm  200 mm). Thim et al (2011) increased the resolution to 1.8 times when using a single-photon processing system with pixel size of 220 mm  220 mm and micro-scanning step size of 1/4 pixel size. They increased the resolution to 1.67 times when using a single-photon processing system with pixel size of 55 mm  55 mm and micro-scanning step size of 1/3 pixel size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%