1996
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(96)00227-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realistic shell-model calculations of the 2νββ nuclear matrix elements and the role of the shell structure in intermediate states

Abstract: We discuss two conditions needed for correct computation of 2νββ nuclear matrix-elements within the realistic shell-model framework. This algorithm yields rapid convergence on the 2νββ matrix-elements, even when neither relevant GT + nor GT − strength distribution is convergent. A significant role of the shell structure is pointed out, which makes the 2νββ matrix-elements highly dominated by the lowlying intermediate states. Experimental information of the low-lying GT ± strengths is strongly desired. Half-liv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some recent shell model calculations are found in theoretical works. [50][51][52][53] The light nucleus of 48 Ca is interesting from the viewpoint of shell model calculations. 1,50) Shell model calculations with a large model space and a Monte-Carlo method have been carried out for processes.…”
Section: Nuclear Models For Matrix Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent shell model calculations are found in theoretical works. [50][51][52][53] The light nucleus of 48 Ca is interesting from the viewpoint of shell model calculations. 1,50) Shell model calculations with a large model space and a Monte-Carlo method have been carried out for processes.…”
Section: Nuclear Models For Matrix Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2νββ running sums calculated for 48 Ca within the nuclear shell model [9][10][11][12] consistently show a substantial overshoot of the total M 2ν GT at excitation energies of about 7 MeV, which then is compensated by a negative contribution coming from the region of the giant GT resonance (GTR). The total M 2ν GT = 0.054 MeV −1 calculated in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As for approaches other than the pn-QRPA, these can be found in, e.g., Refs. [47][48][49][50][51] (the shell model), [52] (the projected HFB), [53] (the microscopic interacting boson model), and [54] (the energy-density functional-plus-generator-coordinate method).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%