2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-01193-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-world experience of palbociclib and ribociclib: novel oral therapy in metastatic breast cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
20
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, patients in Hungary treated with palbociclib had a discontinuation rate of 56.0% at 12 months while 49.6% of patients switched to other therapies 26 . In other studies, a 72.2% discontinuation rate was reported among patients in Spain 19 , while in the US this was 19.9% 24 and in Argentina, 2.0% 13 . In the case of Colombia, the health care system is obliged to guarantee the treatment after approval by the HMO, thus the present study shows that discontinuation was more associated with progression of the disease and safety causes than administrative issues related to insurance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, patients in Hungary treated with palbociclib had a discontinuation rate of 56.0% at 12 months while 49.6% of patients switched to other therapies 26 . In other studies, a 72.2% discontinuation rate was reported among patients in Spain 19 , while in the US this was 19.9% 24 and in Argentina, 2.0% 13 . In the case of Colombia, the health care system is obliged to guarantee the treatment after approval by the HMO, thus the present study shows that discontinuation was more associated with progression of the disease and safety causes than administrative issues related to insurance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The Ibrance Real World Insights Study (IRIS), with results from Argentina, Canada, Germany, and United States, supports the effectiveness and tolerability of palbociclib [13][14][15] . RENATA, POLARIS, and PALPract are other real-world ongoing studies that provide additional data on palbociclib prescribing and treatment patterns in routine clinical practice [16][17][18][19] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Ribociclibe + letrozol: o tratamento combinado foi avaliado pelo ensaio clínico MONALEESA-2 e resultou em SLP média de 27,6 meses, demonstrando benefício significativo na sobrevida livre de progressão em mulheres na pósmenopausa com câncer de mama metastático RH+/HER2-, quando comparada com o uso de letrozol mais placebo. Foi verificado ainda que tal benefício se estende por todos subgrupos analisados pelos estudos, comprovando sua alta eficácia na primeira linha de tratamento (García-Trevijano Cabetas et al, 2021;Hortobagyi et al, 2016;O'Shaughnessy et al, 2018;Sonke et al, 2018;Yardley et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…• Palbociclibe + fulvestranto: foi a primeira combinação com um inibidor de CDK 4 e 6 aprovada para o tratamento de mulheres com câncer de mama que progrediram para doença metastática após terapia hormonal prévia, sendo Research, Society andDevelopment, v. 10, n. 14, e85101421940, 2021 (CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i14.21940 geralmente empregada como terapia de segunda linha. No contexto de tratamento de primeira linha, sua eficácia é reduzida, com sobrevida livre de progressão em torno de 18,7 meses (García-Trevijano Cabetas et al, 2021;Mycock et al, 2021;Seki et al, 2019;Waller et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Не исключено, что полученный эффект был обусловлен проведенной химиотерапией, позволившей добиться уменьшения клона раковых клеток, резистентных к анти CDK4 / 6 терапии, и что контроль над опухолью достигнут за счет чувствительности остаточной опухоли к проводимой терапии. Учитывая схожие механизмы действия и развития резистентности у препаратов рибоциклиб и палбоциклиб [8,11,12], а также отсутствие прямых сравнительных исследований, ожидать ответа на один препарат после прогрессии на другом могло бы показаться нецелесообразным. Но, рассматривая эффективность терапии рибоциклибом после прогрессии на палбоциклибе, следует отметить, что рибоциклиб более активен в CDK4-зависимых линиях клеток, чем в CDK6-зависимых клеточных линиях [13], что после химиотерапии позволяет рассматривать возможность повторного назначения анти-CDK4 / 6 препарата рибоциклиба.…”
Section: обсуждение и выводыunclassified