Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3205455.3205567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-world evolution adapts robot morphology and control to hardware limitations

Abstract: For robots to handle the numerous factors that can affect them in the real world, they must adapt to changes and unexpected events. Evolutionary robotics tries to solve some of these issues by automatically optimizing a robot for a specific environment. Most of the research in this field, however, uses simplified representations of the robotic system in software simulations. The large gap between performance in simulation and the real world makes it challenging to transfer the resulting robots to the real worl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work is related to efforts to optimize controls for robots with non-fixed or reconfigurable morphologies [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], where the controller must handle changes in the robot's physical configuration, either to cope with unanticipated damage [13], [14] or prepare for different tasks [15]. Notably, [16] jointly evolve both morphological and gait parameters on a physical robot able to change its leg lengths dynamically. Application of this method is restricted to robots able to rapidly, repeatedly, and precisely alter their own morphology.…”
Section: B Morphology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work is related to efforts to optimize controls for robots with non-fixed or reconfigurable morphologies [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], where the controller must handle changes in the robot's physical configuration, either to cope with unanticipated damage [13], [14] or prepare for different tasks [15]. Notably, [16] jointly evolve both morphological and gait parameters on a physical robot able to change its leg lengths dynamically. Application of this method is restricted to robots able to rapidly, repeatedly, and precisely alter their own morphology.…”
Section: B Morphology Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hand designed parameters for a conservative gait (referred to as "base gait") based on experience from previous experiments [18], [23]. The walking speed of the robot is limited by the maximum rotational speed of the servos.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also examples of self-reconfiguring morphology used exclusively to guide the search for a better controller of a single hand-designed optimal morphology [17]. In our previous work, we have demonstrated in that earlier versions of the DyRET platform, presented in this paper, can be used 470mm 270mm for evolutionary experiments to optimize morphology using mechanical self-reconfiguration [18]. Our work was the first example of such an approach as far as we are aware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For this investigation, we have selected a range of different evaluation budgets to test. We have previously used 64 and 128 evaluations in our hardware experiments [14,2], and 512, 2048 and 8192 evaluations gives a range more appropriate for simulation experiments. Fig.…”
Section: Complexity For Different Evaluation Budgetsmentioning
confidence: 99%