2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time stochastic optimal scheduling of large-scale electric vehicles: A multidimensional approximate dynamic programming approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the scenario of large EV integration, uncoordinated operation may deteriorate power network operations, likely to result in transformer overloading or dissatisfied power quality. As a result, large-scale EV real-time charging optimization (RTCO) should be considered, because individual EV charging behavior, conventional load profiles, renewable generation output, and real-time price (RTP) are highly stochastic, which is typically a resource scheduling approach with multivariable epistemic uncertainties [25,26]. Table 2 shows the review of the study on electric vehicle access to the distribution network.…”
Section: Figure 3 Overview Of Ev Charge Scheduling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the scenario of large EV integration, uncoordinated operation may deteriorate power network operations, likely to result in transformer overloading or dissatisfied power quality. As a result, large-scale EV real-time charging optimization (RTCO) should be considered, because individual EV charging behavior, conventional load profiles, renewable generation output, and real-time price (RTP) are highly stochastic, which is typically a resource scheduling approach with multivariable epistemic uncertainties [25,26]. Table 2 shows the review of the study on electric vehicle access to the distribution network.…”
Section: Figure 3 Overview Of Ev Charge Scheduling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], a heterogeneous EV fleet is considered. However, the studies assume that the required EV specific details are known by the control system, and this assumption is not further discussed.…”
Section: Properties Of the Evsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bidirectional communication between upper and lower layer is assumed in most studies shown in Table 1. Generally, for example in [913, 20, 2432], the communication from the lower layer to the upper layer is used to describe the required charging demand, and the communication from the upper layer to the lower layer is used to ensure that the grid‐related limitations or objectives are being considered. Alternatively, in [33, 34], Stackelberg games are considered, where the upper layer indirectly controls the decisions of the lower layers using their decisions as a feedback.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Yao et al [40] presented a three-layer control architecture where the top and middle layers are centralized aggregators. References [41], [42] employed the same architecture. In [43]- [45], the top layer is a decentralized aggregator: the nodes are aggregated by centralized aggregators, and then distributed algorithms, more specifically, the game theory approach is applied to regulate the centralized aggregators.…”
Section: A Control Algorithms and Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%